Editing
Dip Class
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{dnd-stub}} '''Dip Class''' is a piece of gamer slang that emerged into the /tg/ world as a result of [[Dungeons & Dragons 3rd Edition]], although seeds of it had been sown in its precursor, [[Advanced Dungeons & Dragons]]. Born out of the conflux of [[multiclassing]] and [[Linear Warriors, Quadratic Wizards]], the term "dip class" signifies a class that you "dip into" (only take a small number of levels from) in order to gain increased potency when combined with the features of your other, primary class. Generally speaking, the dip class is usually considered too weak to be worthwhile to follow extensively, but it has traits that mesh well with another, stronger class. Even if a class is worth following to the end, strong class features gained early on that either 1: don't scale or 2: have scaling that is not dependent upon class level can make a class worth dipping to use these features on a different class. The original form of this concept came about in [[Advanced Dungeons & Dragons]], when [[human]]s had the unique rule of "dual-classing". It was extremely common - so much so that AD&D-based video-games like [[Baldur's Gate]] often have guides advising players to do so - to have player start out as a [[fighter]], for those precious low-level hit points, [[THAC0]] and weapon slots, and then dual-class to [[Wizard]], which would allow you to access its superior end-game abilities. 3e invented this concept, and [[Pathfinder]] arguably perfected it, what with the latter's enormous roster of classes and their wide swing of usefulness. The concept almost died in [[Dungeons & Dragons 4th Edition]], due to the [[AEDU System]] and how multiclassing & hybrid classing worked; it did still happen, but it wasn't quite as prevalent (or as cheesy) as it had been in the last edition. [[Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition]] brought it back, but at least added some depth to it; most now recommend dipping into a secondary class at least enough to get its first subclass features. Also, caster/caster and martial-primary/caster-dip dip-classing has become more prevalent; the [[paladin]] with a few levels in [[Sorcerer (Dungeons & Dragons)|sorcerer]] or [[warlock]] is widely considered one of the best class combos in 5e. Dipping is often used to qualify for a [[Prestige Class]], especially one that advances the dipped class. The requirements for Prestige Classes generally expect dips for entry. Prestige classes may also be dipped, both for the same reason base classes are, and because they lose casting advancement at higher levels. Using a prestige class that is strictly better than the base class (i.e., pretty much any prestige class with full casting advancement and actual class features), generally does not make the base class a dip, even if entered with a minimum of levels via early entry cheese. Diping classes is a good way to show how retarded [[Favored Class]] is. Dipping 1 level in every class doesn't incur penalties, but a Barbarian 6/Ranger 3 is crippled. Classes typically dipped instead of taken fully include <!-- Core classes in alphabetical order, then non-core classes and archetypes in alphabetical order --> *[[Fighter]]: Two levels gives all proficiencies and two bonus feats. 5E instead of early feats gives a bonus-action heal and an at will additional action per rest. *[[Monk]]: Two levels gives a random list of proficiencies, wisdom to armor class, evasion and two feats. *[[Paladin]]: Two levels give all proficiencies, immunity to fear, and charisma to saves require no scaling, which are all are welcome on any charisma based class. Having a single level is sufficient to activate magic items that use Paladin spells, and three gives another immunity. Advancing just gives you more smites and some casting that keys off the wrong stats. In 5e, the paladins smite ability can be keyed off of other classes spell slots. *[[Duskblade]]: In addition to proficiencies, their main ability isn't restricted to Duskblade spells and using Duskblade in an Eldritch Knight build lets them use a far higher rate of casting with it. Despite being dipable, Duskblade is quite playable on its own. *[[Hexblade]]: Is quite similiar to Paladin in this regard. Mettle and Resitance both have no scaling, and while their curse is dependent upon level, it's a free action to attempt and still scales slightly from charisma alone. *Spellslinger [[Wizard]]: In exchange for gimped casting, this archetype gives the ability to cast spells through guns. This ability is not restricted to Wizard spells, and it always better to take only a single level in this archetype plus 19 in any other full caster than using it in any other way. *[[Swashbuckler]]: Both the 3.5 and Pathfinder versions give everything of value in the first few levels and have nothing worth staying for. *[[Warlock]]: While a playable class in its own right, many least evocations give all day buffs that can be quite useful. For anyone with a source of sneak attack or other bonus damage, Eldritch Blast can be a potent weapon on its own. In 5e, the warlock is a powerful multiclass for paladins , allowing a paladin to become less Multi Ability Score dependent, as the hexblade pact from level 1 lets you key your attacks off of Charisma rather than Strength, allowing a paladin to focus on just cha and con, rather than str con and cha. Other classes can use it similiarly to lessen the necessity for str and dex. At level 2, the warlock gains the ability to take the agonizing blast invocation, which causes eldritch blast to scale in terms of damage at the same rate as a fighter, however it scales off of player level rather than class level. With a sorcerer, two levels in warlock allow you to essentially play as an always action surging fighter while you still have sorcery points. *[[Bard]]: In 3e, Bardsongs (musical spellcasting) and most other things were tied to total character level, not Bard levels - making 1-level Bard dips viable. As such, it was commonly joked that best "Bard" build is Bard 1/Rogue 19, due to same spellcasting with better class features. This was fixed in 3.5e. [[Category: Gamer Slang]] [[Category: Dungeons & Dragons]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to 2d4chan may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
2d4chan:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Template used on this page:
Template:Dnd-stub
(
edit
)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information