Gladiator: Difference between revisions
1d4chan>Agiletek No edit summary |
m (28 revisions imported) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''Gladiator''' is a combination of a fighter and a performer, being a character who partakes in live combat displays for the entertainment of a crowd. Gladiators are usually associated with slavery, as risking one's life for money is seen as the sort of thing usually only a crazy person would do if they had the choice. | [[image:Colosseum.jpg|thumb|400px|right|LET'S GET READY TO RUUUUUMMBBBBLLLEEE!!!]] | ||
{{topquote|ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED!?|Gladiator}} | |||
A '''Gladiator''' is a combination of a fighter and a performer, being a character who partakes in live combat displays for the entertainment of a crowd. Gladiators are usually associated with slavery, as risking one's life for money is seen as the sort of thing usually only a crazy or desperately poor person would do if they had the choice. | |||
The iconic gladiator in most peoples' minds stems from basic knowledge of the [[Roman Empire]], in which they were hugely popular. Misconceptions about the empire fuelled by old "swords & sandals" films further fuel beliefs about gladiators, like that they were regularly expected to kill each other for the amusement of the baying hordes of spectators. In actual fact, true gladiators of the Roman Empire were probably closer to professional wrestlers today; they did fight, and they did bleed, but a lot of what they did was staged for entertainment purposes. Gladiators were big money makers, but they also ''cost'' a fortune to train up in the first place; death matches in a Colosseum were usually fought between executed criminals - it was ''very'' rare for a professional gladiator to fight to the death. Nonetheless, the image of a scarred, battered thug who kills to survive or for money as decadent nobles cheer him on remains embedded in the collective consciousness. | The iconic gladiator in most peoples' minds stems from basic knowledge of the [[Roman Empire]], in which they were hugely popular. Misconceptions about the empire fuelled by old "swords & sandals" films further fuel beliefs about gladiators, like that they were regularly expected to kill each other for the amusement of the baying hordes of spectators. In actual fact, true gladiators of the Roman Empire were probably closer to professional wrestlers today; they did fight, and they did bleed, but a lot of what they did was staged for entertainment purposes. Gladiators were big money makers, but they also ''cost'' a fortune to train up in the first place; death matches in a Colosseum were usually fought between executed criminals - it was ''very'' rare for a professional gladiator to fight to the death. Nonetheless, the image of a scarred, battered thug who kills to survive or for money as decadent nobles cheer him on remains embedded in the collective consciousness. | ||
Roman Gladiators came in a number of archetypes, like stock characters: there was the popular Murmillo, who fought with sword and shield and wore a distinctive closed helmet, the retiarius who fought with a trident and net, or the venator, who mostly fought wild animals. | Roman Gladiators came in a number of archetypes, like stock characters: there was the popular Murmillo, who fought with sword and shield and wore a distinctive closed helmet, the retiarius who fought with a trident and net, or the venator, who mostly fought wild animals (Hispania was really into that last one, which evolved into modern bullfighting). Unfortunately, archaeology suggests most classes fought only a limited selection of other classes instead of any class fighting any other class. | ||
A slight note on the Latin if you're curious: Latin is a gendered language. The "Tor" in "gladiators" refers to the gender of the person. That's why a female "gladiator" would be more properly called a "gladiatrix", the "trix" means woman. It's also why Dominatrix ends with the "trix", it's a woman "trix" dominating "Domina". Many such words derived from Latin, like Senator, have lost this distinction in modern English. | A slight note on the Latin if you're curious: Latin is a gendered language. The "Tor" in "gladiators" refers to the gender of the person. That's why a female "gladiator" would be more properly called a "gladiatrix", the "trix" means woman. It's also why Dominatrix ends with the "trix", it's a woman "trix" dominating "Domina". Many such words derived from Latin, like Senator, have lost this distinction in modern English. | ||
| Line 20: | Line 22: | ||
==Pathfinder 2nd== | ==Pathfinder 2nd== | ||
An archetype that any class can take to extenuate a charismatic pit fighter. You gain bonuses when spectators are around as you | An archetype that any class can take to extenuate a charismatic pit fighter. You gain bonuses when spectators are around as you wow them with your killing and showmanship. Also, get some exotic weapons and learn how to non-lethal better. [[List of Archetypes in Pathfinder Second Edition#Acrobat|see more]] | ||
{{Pathfinder-2nd-Edition-Archetypes}} | {{Pathfinder-2nd-Edition-Archetypes}} | ||
[[category:history]][[Category:Dark Sun]] | [[category:history]][[Category:Dark Sun]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:12, 21 June 2023
"ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED!?"
- – Gladiator
A Gladiator is a combination of a fighter and a performer, being a character who partakes in live combat displays for the entertainment of a crowd. Gladiators are usually associated with slavery, as risking one's life for money is seen as the sort of thing usually only a crazy or desperately poor person would do if they had the choice.
The iconic gladiator in most peoples' minds stems from basic knowledge of the Roman Empire, in which they were hugely popular. Misconceptions about the empire fuelled by old "swords & sandals" films further fuel beliefs about gladiators, like that they were regularly expected to kill each other for the amusement of the baying hordes of spectators. In actual fact, true gladiators of the Roman Empire were probably closer to professional wrestlers today; they did fight, and they did bleed, but a lot of what they did was staged for entertainment purposes. Gladiators were big money makers, but they also cost a fortune to train up in the first place; death matches in a Colosseum were usually fought between executed criminals - it was very rare for a professional gladiator to fight to the death. Nonetheless, the image of a scarred, battered thug who kills to survive or for money as decadent nobles cheer him on remains embedded in the collective consciousness.
Roman Gladiators came in a number of archetypes, like stock characters: there was the popular Murmillo, who fought with sword and shield and wore a distinctive closed helmet, the retiarius who fought with a trident and net, or the venator, who mostly fought wild animals (Hispania was really into that last one, which evolved into modern bullfighting). Unfortunately, archaeology suggests most classes fought only a limited selection of other classes instead of any class fighting any other class.
A slight note on the Latin if you're curious: Latin is a gendered language. The "Tor" in "gladiators" refers to the gender of the person. That's why a female "gladiator" would be more properly called a "gladiatrix", the "trix" means woman. It's also why Dominatrix ends with the "trix", it's a woman "trix" dominating "Domina". Many such words derived from Latin, like Senator, have lost this distinction in modern English.
DnD[edit]
In Dungeons & Dragons, gladiators first appeared as a variant Fighter class from Dark Sun in the Advanced Dungeons & Dragons game. While the Dark Sun fighter got lots of social powers revolving around leading armies and attracting followers, the gladiator stood out as the meanest bitch on the block in an edition where the fighter was already the king of combat.
The Athas Dot Org update of Dark Sun to third edition made Gladiator a weird class that got a bunch of random exotic weapons, a good reflex save, some support abilities, passable skill points per level and variant bardic music. They'd probably be a very low Tier 4 or high tier 5. The Dragon Magazine update said they're just Fighters with particular builds.
This would later be remade into a character theme in 4th edition, whilst Dragon Magazine would have articles on playing gladiator-themed characters in general, for both 3rd edition and 4th edition. Returns in 5th edition as an alternate for the Entertainer Background that grants Proficiency in Acrobatics and Performance, as well as, oddly, a disguise kit and a musical instrument that can be replaced with a more traditional weapon like a trident. Pathfinder, naturally, gave the fighter an archetype that focuses on gladiatorial combat, and one sourcebook features a whole system of "Performance Combat" centered around gladiatorial contests.
In 5e the Gladiator comes back with a variant background for Entertainers. Rather then a more traditional entertainer, singing or music of the like, you can be a Gladiator, a show fighter. You can swap out your musical instrument for a inexpensive but unusual weapon, such as a trident or net, and you can use your feature to find places to fight for money.
Spheres of Might[edit]
Gladiator is a sphere in Spheres of Might for Pathfinder and Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition. It focuses on demoralizing enemies and "boasts" which buff and debuff.
Pathfinder 2nd[edit]
An archetype that any class can take to extenuate a charismatic pit fighter. You gain bonuses when spectators are around as you wow them with your killing and showmanship. Also, get some exotic weapons and learn how to non-lethal better. see more