Mary Sue: Difference between revisions

From 2d4chan
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1d4chan>Tim
1d4chan>Tim
Line 50: Line 50:
* Is it a fan character that is better than the canon characters?
* Is it a fan character that is better than the canon characters?
* Do all the canon characters suddenly start talking about a fan character, with their presence in the story largely relegated to providing opportunities for the new character to show how pure, powerful, good-hearted, etc they are?
* Do all the canon characters suddenly start talking about a fan character, with their presence in the story largely relegated to providing opportunities for the new character to show how pure, powerful, good-hearted, etc they are?
* Are they someone's self-proclaimed [[furry|fursona]]? (If so, stop reading this list and burn them for [[heresy]]).
* Does she ever make bad decisions?  That don't end up being surprise correct choices later?
* Does she ever make bad decisions?  That don't end up being surprise correct choices later?
* Do you use absolutes like "always," "everybody," or "never" when describing her abilities?
* Do you use absolutes like "always," "everybody," or "never" when describing her abilities?

Revision as of 02:26, 2 February 2012

This article or section contains opinions shared by all and/or vast quantities of Derp. It is liable to cause Rage. Take things with a grain of salt and a peck of Troll.
How it works.

Originally a Mary Sue is a character that is a shameless self-insert, poorly developed, without flaws and stupidly overpowered. /tg/ hates Mary Sues.

Unfortunately, after so much rage and so many troll threads, /tg/'s definition of Mary Sue has become blurred; no one can agree on what the phrase means, to the point where the mere mention of Mary Sue is enough to set off shitstorms across the board.

Some accept nothing less than the above description, and will sooner gut you then look twice if you say it's anything else. Others prefer a more generalized definition, which refers to an overly-idealized character who exerts an unjust amount of influence upon their respective setting or story. Others still carry this meaning out to extremes, and use the term to describe anyone who isn't a homeless junkie or a brooding sociopath with an alignment of chaotic neutral.

The term is commonly used by trolls, and can most easily be spotted by a blanket accusation of a character being a Sue without attempting to justify actual reasons behind it. More clever trolls will attempt to offer some explanation that is deliberately intended to get under the offended party's skin.

Never Ending List of Mary Sues

(Note: please post Mary Sues in alphabetical order, so they don't fight about who's the better Mary-Sue.)

  • All Na'vi
  • Alucard from Hellsing Ultimate (Not that prissy shit of an anime series).
  • Bella
  • C'tan
  • Cordell Walker from Walker Texas Ranger (the source of all the Chuck-Norris jokes)
  • Kaldor Draigo. two simple words: Matt fucking Ward.
  • Drizzt (Deep down inside, you know it's true)
  • Edward
  • Elves, especially their heroes.
  • Elminster Aumar (Forgotten Realms)
  • Eldrad, and what's worse: he knows he is, and is a complete dick about it.
  • Ember Storm
  • Force Commander Vanilla Ice- As in from the DOWII game where the player names him whatever they want, often their own name. By definition, yes. But Sergeant (later Captain) Aramus from the book (the one not written by Goto)? No.
  • Golden Aquilas.
  • Green Lantern, especially Hal Jordan.
  • Harry Potter. Just.... Harry Potter.
  • Jacob.
  • James Bond varies, but the Roger Moore version is closest; he's unbeatable at just about everything, implausibly intelligent, a crack shot, and basically unkillable.
  • Kenshiro, nothing can kill him and he's morally flawless, superior to everyone-fucking-else.
  • Marneus Calgar, Marneus, Mar-n-eus, (e and s swap places) Mar-n-sue, (turn the n upsidedown), Mar-u-sue, (give the u a tail): Mary sue
  • Med'an from World of Warcrack. Part-Human, part-Orc and part-Draenei, inheritor of the top-spot in Azeroth mages, even beyond (-)any(-) High Elf mage. Also related to several lore characters in one way or another.
  • Mordenkainen (Gary Gygax's personal avatar in the Greyhawk setting and a level 30 wizard who never fucking ages past 50 despite being a hundred fucking years old without turning into a lich, he became bald for some reason, which makes him look evil, but he remains stupid neutral).
  • Rhonin, archmage of the Kirin-Tor, World of Warcrap.
  • most 13 year-olds's RPG characters.
  • Richard, from the Sword of Truth series (he's not as b.s. in the t.v. series)
  • Space Marine smurfs.
  • Thrall, Orc raised in a humie internment camp, became Azeroth's premiere shaman and leader of half the world. World of Warcramps.
  • The Unholy, half-crow cowgirl in Vampire: The Requiem
  • Young main characters in crappy Japanese animes and manga.
  • any White Wolf employee that shows up at a Vampire LARP session is automatically playing a millennia-old demigod vamp. (I wish I was exagerating; they've waded into living-city LARP games as antediluvians and permanently killed people's Camarilla characters.)

(More to be added later (sounds of crying editors))

How Can I Tell If My Character Is A Mary Sue?

  • Does she start the story at the pinnacle of achievement?
  • Is there any way for the character to grow or improve during the story?
  • Is it a fan character that is better than the canon characters?
  • Do all the canon characters suddenly start talking about a fan character, with their presence in the story largely relegated to providing opportunities for the new character to show how pure, powerful, good-hearted, etc they are?
  • Are they someone's self-proclaimed fursona? (If so, stop reading this list and burn them for heresy).
  • Does she ever make bad decisions? That don't end up being surprise correct choices later?
  • Do you use absolutes like "always," "everybody," or "never" when describing her abilities?
  • Do they feature an entirely contrived "weakness" that doesn't affect them any time it would harm them (such as being clumsy unless they are required to perform a great feat of athleticism) or isn't really a weakness (such as being too kind or righteous "for their own good") which was clearly added soley so the author could point to it when accused of writing a Sue?
  • Did Matt Ward write this character?

Gallery

External Links