Dragon Magazine: Difference between revisions

From 2d4chan
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1d4chan>Dracolich
(Dragon Magazine was, alongside Dungeon magazine, one of the two official in-house publications supporting D&D.)
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
Dragon Magazine was, alongside [[Dungeon Magazine]], one of the two official monthly magazines supporting D&D. It was in print from 1976 - 2007 published by [[paizo]], then bought back by [[WOTC]] and published as a PDF support of 4e. It was quietly put out of its misery in 2013 when 5th edition became a thing, and probably won't be back any time soon. Who the fuck buys dead trees in 2015?
Dragon Magazine was, alongside [[Dungeon Magazine]], one of the two official monthly magazines supporting D&D. It was in print from 1976 - 2007 published by [[paizo]], then bought back by [[WOTC]] and published as a PDF support of 4e. It was quietly put out of its misery in 2013 when 5th edition became a thing, and probably won't be back any time soon. Who the fuck buys dead trees in 2015?


We can all blame [[Hasbro]], of course. Soul-less, emotion-less automatons that they are. Like passively malicious [[modrons]].
We can all blame [[Hasbro]], of course. Soul-less, emotion-less automatons that they are. Like passively malicious [[modron]]s.

Revision as of 14:26, 27 March 2015

This article related to Dungeons & Dragons is a stub. You can help 1d4chan by expanding it

Dragon Magazine was, alongside Dungeon Magazine, one of the two official monthly magazines supporting D&D. It was in print from 1976 - 2007 published by paizo, then bought back by WOTC and published as a PDF support of 4e. It was quietly put out of its misery in 2013 when 5th edition became a thing, and probably won't be back any time soon. Who the fuck buys dead trees in 2015?

We can all blame Hasbro, of course. Soul-less, emotion-less automatons that they are. Like passively malicious modrons.