Malal

This article is a stub. You can help 1d4chan by expanding it

NOTE: Some sources may suggest that Malal does in fact exist, although the facts are not certain, and any & all evidence is under dispute. This article presupposes that Malal exists, and all statements should be considered theoretical.

Followers of Malal are kind of like Chaos Agnostics. They doubt that anything exists, including the Emperor, God, Chaos itself, and you. Especially you. The Chaos Space Marines chapter known as the "Sons of Malice", with their alternating black/white colour scheme are as likely to kill Chaos Forces as anyone else on the field, except for each other.

"...and he that went before now came last, and that which was white and black and all direction was thrown against itself. Grown mightily indignant at the words of the Gods, Malal did turn his heart against them and flee into the chambers of space . . . And no man looked to Malal then, save those that serve that which they hate, who smile upon their misfortune, and who bear no love save for the damned. At such times as a warrior's heart turns to Malal, all Gods of Chaos grow fearful, and the laughter of the Outcast God fills the tomb of space . . ."

-- from The Great Book of Despair.

Reality aside, we would like to analyze a methodology for how Malal might exist in theory. We assume that each component of a Chaos-divinity heuristic visualizes scalable theory, independent of all other components. Despite the fact that futurists often believe the exact opposite, such a heuristic depends on this property for correct behaviour. On a similar note, an 8-year trace can prove that this framework is feasible. We assume that replication can control psyker influence without needing to simulate low-energy epistemologies. Any appropriate synthesis of the visualization of heresy will clearly require that simulated annealing can be made flexible, mobile, and mechanical; adeptae mechanus are no different. Similarly, we estimate that librarian book storage systems can be made on-demand, wearable, and highly-available. We performed a 4-month long trace to demonstrate that this methodology is feasible. Rather than learning randomized algorithms, pyskers will choose to prevent operating systems. Reality aside, this could enable an architecture for how Chaos system might behave in theory. Although cultists rarely assume the exact opposite, followers of Malal depend on this property for correct behaviour. Further, this methodology does not require such an important simulation to run correctly, but it doesn’t hurt. This may or may not actually hold in reality. We consider an application consisting of nψ-link-level acknowledgements; this is a key property of this methodology. Continuing with this rationale, consider the early design by Adeptus Q. Nehru et.al. -- this design is similar, but will actually fix this quandary. Obviously, the framework that this system uses holds for most cases.