User talk:Sdhjk
Okay, here's the deal...[edit source]
One of the most annoying and obnoxious stereotypes in nerd culture is the "um ackshually" guy. Surely you know the type: that one asshole who will insert himself into any-fucking-thing you try to talk about in his presence, say "um, ackshually..." and proceed to spout something inane, wrong, tangential at best, and/or so long-winded you'll forget what you were talking about if you don't have the balls to shut him up. He has memorized volumes of Shit Nobody Cares About on a variety of topics, usually centering on anime, comics, or /tg/ material, always either the least-common-denominator of those mediums or something nobody's heard of that he latched onto like a duckling latches onto the first thing it sees, and will often try to derive jargon from it as if other people could ever know what the fuck he's talking about. He cannot fucking stop himself from sharing this with everyone, because he has nothing else to offer the world and takes solace in being an "expert" in such random crap. It gets even better if you reveal you do, in fact, know enough about the topic in question to call him on his shit, as he will invariably throw a tantrum when what he sees as his sole redeeming value is threatened. Everyone hates that guy, including himself. He is one of the lowest forms of neckbeard, below even the theater kid and often comorbid with the furry.
On the Internet the "um ackshually" guy, without anyone to interrupt, has to spout his irritating nonsense someplace else: wikis. It is the "um ackshually" guy who gives us the bureaucratic fucks on Wikipedia who try to "correct" Ph.D's in their chosen fields on shit they spent six years studying. It is the "um ackshually" guy who is responsible for TVTropes, in all its septic glory, where everyone's seeming goal is to staple as many blue words onto as many things as physically possible. And, on our very own 1d4chan, it was the "um ackshually" guy who decided every turd that came out of a TSR employee's asshole needed to be preserved in wiki form for all eternity, everything with a statblock in his favorite game needed a full profile, and every other paragraph needs a sentence fragment or three that undermines the idea and readability of the entire thing, like surgically implanting a second appendix. The latter group are the gang of idiots who founded the 1d4chan discord, and consequently 1d6chan.
Please stop being the "um ackshually" guy. 1d4chan is (was) culturally descended from ED, almost deliberately created as an antidote to the autistic cancer represented by the "um ackshually" guy. Articles should be short, punchy, useful, relevant to /tg/ culture (especially /tg/ culture as of the 2008-2012 period when 90% of the articles that don't blow chunks were written) and short. This doesn't mean everything has to be a stub or copying from 1d6chan is totally verboten, but article length should as a rule be proportionate to the amount /tg/ as a culture has to say about something that can't be looked up in a splatbook or other primary source. What you've generally been doing is the opposite of that, and it's pissing me off. Pachinko Man (talk) 02:37, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Copy/Past articles from 1d6chan[edit source]
This is what you are doing now, eh? You are such a pathetic little creature. 88.188.8.167 16:10, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- Well, but you didn't do anything at all yet. Critiquing, but not doing anything. --Sdhjk (talk) 16:23, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- You know, this wiki is very outdated. It has so many things to fix, that a bot is required. But i don't have a bot. --Sdhjk (talk) 16:32, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- Besides, at least i copy/paste good things. The rest of activity are some spam bots filling the wiki with nonsense. --Sdhjk (talk) 16:34, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- And 1d6chan is no better. Their admin, Gilten, constantly vandalizes everything. --Sdhjk (talk) 09:03, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- How so? By reverting your edits and banning you for the nth time? 90.80.221.226 11:27, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- Not only. Some of his actions are strange. Like, removed instruction about blocking TvTropes anti-adblock message - not just reverting it, but hiding it from page revision history. As if knowing how to remove their ads was more infuriating and dangerous to host, than copyright infringement. Despite page being anti-TvT, and removing their TvT would help to deprive them of money from ads (which is their main source of income), therefore harming them. As such, Gilten doesn't know if he's supposed to be pro-TvT (re-write page then) or anti-TvT (don't remove the tips in talk then). --Sdhjk (talk) 14:00, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
- So yeah, you do not like him because he is actively reverting your shitty editing. Got it. Have fun in this graveyard! 88.188.8.167 19:12, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
- Not only. Some of his actions are strange. Like, removed instruction about blocking TvTropes anti-adblock message - not just reverting it, but hiding it from page revision history. As if knowing how to remove their ads was more infuriating and dangerous to host, than copyright infringement. Despite page being anti-TvT, and removing their TvT would help to deprive them of money from ads (which is their main source of income), therefore harming them. As such, Gilten doesn't know if he's supposed to be pro-TvT (re-write page then) or anti-TvT (don't remove the tips in talk then). --Sdhjk (talk) 14:00, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
- How so? By reverting your edits and banning you for the nth time? 90.80.221.226 11:27, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- And 1d6chan is no better. Their admin, Gilten, constantly vandalizes everything. --Sdhjk (talk) 09:03, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Ban on 1d6chan[edit source]
I finally found you. It's on me tho, you were not really hidden. So, I know you are the guy I keep banning on 1d6chan. I only have one question: why are you coming back each time I do so? - Gilten (talk) 09:55, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
I mean, it's not like I keep reverting your edits. What you are doing is pretty useless. - Gilten (talk) 09:58, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
On top of all, you keep editing the same articles each time you come back. It has become very easy to spot you. - Gilten (talk) 09:59, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
At this point, I just want answers. Why are you doing this? Why are you inflicting this on us and yourself? Is it because you think you are better than the other editors of 1d6chan? That they must be stupid to not see that your contribution should be the new standard? Or is it because you just want to bait me out of spite and revenge? - Gilten (talk) 10:02, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- Not "spiting" or "revenging" anything; you're one of more adequate administrators out there (like, TvTropes admins are worse - can ban for nothing and vandalize their own project by reverting constructive edits of banned users). Trying to make wiki better, and some edits are OK. And some things which western admins consider to be rule violations, are considered to be either minor misdemeanors or outright useful edits by eastern admins. --Sdhjk (talk) 10:11, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- Huh. You genuinely think that... Ok, tell you what: since we did not find any way to definitively ban you, I will let you edit things as if you were a normal user. And if you are doing something bad, I will "just" revert the problematic part of your edit and explain to you why I did so. That way, you will be able to improve. Deal? - Gilten (talk) 10:21, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- Good idea. Any other deals? --Sdhjk (talk) 12:17, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- Not yet. We will see how things evolve. I did not ban you account User:Ikmtfgfd. You could use it, or create another one. Your choice. - Gilten (talk) 12:41, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- I'm cool with this as long as it keeps all of you in your gay baby jail until you learn to lurk and assimilate why 1d4chan was cool and popular in the first place: a time capsule of pre-redditpocalypse imageboard culture. Pachinko Man (talk) 00:13, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
- Dude, this website is dying. It is overflowed by bots, and soon the money will run-out and it will simply cease to exist. Let it go. You have no other choice. - Gilten (talk) 03:39, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
- That's correct - yet internet connection to 1d6Chan is absolutely awful. Connection to 2d4Chan is fine. So there's choice between correctly functioning dump heap and hardly-reachable good wiki. --Sdhjk (talk) 19:35, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
- And as such to easily connect, i either copy text from 1d6Chan to 2d4Chan, or save 1d6Chan pages into WebArchive. --Sdhjk (talk) 19:48, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
- >You have no other choice.
- Only a Sith deals in absolutes. There's a really good choice - to not get in the circle and start jerking you off, dump the wiki so when (if) it does die it can start again as soon someone else willing to host becomes available. That's what you did, after all. 185.156.46.183 03:14, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, and we still maintain 1d6chan. So why would I create another website based on 2d4chan data? Do it if you want, nobody can stop you. - Gilten (talk) 12:32, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- Dude, this website is dying. It is overflowed by bots, and soon the money will run-out and it will simply cease to exist. Let it go. You have no other choice. - Gilten (talk) 03:39, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
- I'm cool with this as long as it keeps all of you in your gay baby jail until you learn to lurk and assimilate why 1d4chan was cool and popular in the first place: a time capsule of pre-redditpocalypse imageboard culture. Pachinko Man (talk) 00:13, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
- Not yet. We will see how things evolve. I did not ban you account User:Ikmtfgfd. You could use it, or create another one. Your choice. - Gilten (talk) 12:41, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- Good idea. Any other deals? --Sdhjk (talk) 12:17, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- Huh. You genuinely think that... Ok, tell you what: since we did not find any way to definitively ban you, I will let you edit things as if you were a normal user. And if you are doing something bad, I will "just" revert the problematic part of your edit and explain to you why I did so. That way, you will be able to improve. Deal? - Gilten (talk) 10:21, 1 October 2025 (UTC)