Editing Ranger

{{NeedsImages}}
Rangers are usually nature-loving fellas, wielding either a bow or two swords. They are patterned after a certain copyrighted hero from a certain copyrighted fantasy [[The_Lord_of_the_Rings|book]]. They are warriors that are generally useful for tracking down enemies. They also are shitty divine magic users.

It is worth noting that one of the defining features of rangers is that they specialize in hunting down and killing members of specific races. From a pragmatic standpoint, this means they boil down to little more than racist serial killers who target by species (unless one of those species is their own, in which case they're probably some sort of bounty hunter). Being that race wars are one of the cornerstones of [[D&D]], this is unsurprising. They are rendered irrelevant by [[CoDzilla|druidzillas]], because rangers just can't compete with a guy who can turn into a giant bear that shoots giant bears out of his eyes while farting lightning and mauling things with its own overpowered pet grizzly bear. Rangers can get a half-assed pet grizzly bear, but because their animal companions are only as good as a druid that has half as many levels as he does, it's half-assed. [[Pathfinder]] gave them more fighting style options, made archery actually worth a damn, an animal companion that is only 3 levels behind the druids (which can be fixed with a feat), gave them better survivability and a couple of nifty spells, but the concept remained the same.

In the 1st and 2nd editions of Dungeons and Dragons, rangers were not able to sneak or fight properly in chainmail or better, or shields either. Armor was so key in melee under these versions that this led to the popular mocking party cry of "Ranger down!", heard during just about every battle. Rangers were thought to be the inspiration for the "At Death's Door" survival rule, since they would never survive a single session otherwise. They had ''some'' unique tricks, but they suffered from being essentially half-assed [[multiclassing|fighter-druid-thieves]] without really outshining any of their components all that well unless you were out in the wilderness or engaged in other very-specific situations.

Third edition made them a bit less useless, but it also ensured that their previously-somewhat-unique tricks, like dual-wielding weapons, tracking down enemies, or having cool animal companions, became things other classes could do too, and often, humiliatingly, do much better than the ranger. Druids in particular got a ''better'' bear than the ranger, and ''they'' could turn it into an unstoppable killing machine with buff magic. Even [[Pathfinder]] barely helped the sad-sacks out, with a few buffs that other fighting classes generally got too anyway.

In 4e they get to mark their enemies, making them useful when you're fighting one tough thing and a bit crap against swarms. They can either slaughter one enemy, or irritate several, depending on what the situation calls for. Or they can completely miss with their most powerful once-per-milestone attack, and that's some fun. This edition removed the spellcasting abilities of earlier editions, since they had always been pretty shitty casters anyway and it was mostly a poor attempt to justify some of the more esoteric abilities of the class. The "spellcasting archer" archetype was eventually spun off into its own class, the [[Seeker]].

Unfortunately, in 5e, they are generally considered the weakest class in the game for a wide number of extremely good reasons.  A ranger isn't ''useless'', but outside of a few niche roles involving tracking things, there is very little they can do that other classes can't do better.  And a lot of their abilities are just ''wretched'', with very limited utility (rangers are good at tracking... and that's about it), probably the ''worst'' first-level benefits in the game, plenty of "dead levels" with no gains to ''anything'' but proficiency bonus and spell levels, and heavy reliance on an extremely-limited selection of spells to even function on par with other martials.  They share many of these problems with [[paladins]], but paladins actually have some class abilities that scale naturally as they level and don't need to spend spell slots for ''some'' of their class features.  Rangers don't, and, humiliatingly, get a cut-down, useless version of the paladin's divine sense ''at a higher level'' that ''eats a spell slot''.

And while the decision to remove virtually all combat benefits from preferred enemy and terrain might've been ''intended'' to make them less serial killer-ish and prevent the DM from not including any of the ranger's favored enemies in the campaing, in practice it just means there's little benefit to it whatsoever short of picking up a free language if it's a talking kind of enemy.  To add insult to injury, the "capstone" level 20 class ability is ''extremely'' weak, and contains a combat benefit to preferred enemy that everyone and their mother agrees should've been a part of the class at level 1.  They ''tried'' to fold it all into the ''hunter's mark'' spell... but rangers are absolutely ''starved'' for spell slots just to keep up anyway, and a fighter's comparative abilities recharge every short rest.  Nobody likes being compelled to burn precious resources and gish when they can so clearly remember not having to.  Again, problems largely shared with paladins (the half-casters really got the shaft this edition), but paladins have a few tricks to make their lives easier that rangers don't.  Plus, that ''hunter's mark'' eats a bonus action, so while they do okay with ranged weapons, good luck trying to two-weapon fight like so many "iconic" ''D&D'' rangers have in the past.

And, of course, there's the much-maligned animal companion, available as an archetype benefit, that wanders derpily around unless you burn your own actions to let it use them.  ''Everyone'', even the class's defenders, will admit this is at best unnecessarily limiting, given the way spellcasters can throw summons around, and at worst completely nonsensical.  In the rules as written, a dying ranger's animal companion will stand around like a statue while its partner bleeds out!  (An Ask the Sage article did later specify that a ranger's animal can still use actions when he's incapacitated, restrained, etc., but still!)

Again, they aren't ''useless''... just completely outclassed by many other classes that can do their jobs better than they can.

They regained their spellcasting knack in this edition, although an Unearthed Arcana on the WoTC includes a non-caster Ranger variant/Ranger class option as part of its example on custom-brewing new class stuff for 5e. This version of the Ranger instead gets the ability to cook up herbal healing poultices, resistance to poison (and ability to use a poultice to cure poisoning in a friend), a non-magical ability to persuade local critters to fight for them temporarily, and automatically getting a superiority dice under the right circumstances. Non-spellcasting rangers with animal companions get the ability to halve damage enemies deal to their pets instead of the ability to share spells.  It's... well, it's ''nice'', but not having ''hunter's mark'' hurts like a sonofabitch, and those poultices that replace half your spells taking a minute to work is just uncalled for.  

[http://media.wizards.com/2015/downloads/dnd/DX_0907_UA_RangerOptions.pdf A recent Unearthed Arcana] based around the ranger addressed player feedback that the ranger felt a bit weak, with many unsatisfying elements. In particular, it mentions that companions in general are a bitch and a half to manage: too strong, and the player effectively gets two characters to play at the same time and, at worst, an unmanageable long-term advantage, but too weak and who gives a shit about that critter you have to burn actions to get moving and attacking? (Potential parallels to long-term, well-known, and well-documented issues regarding casters and summoning spell abuse were, naturally [[CoDzilla| ignored with an almost religious fervor]].)

The result was probably considerably more powerful, but a lot less popular, with lame-brained attempts to reflavor the ranger into a kind of nature paladin, while actively poo-poohing the fixes ''everyone'' asks for (more low-level combat benefits, either more spells or less-heavy reliance on them, combat attachments to preferred enemy, etc.).  It was a decent class, perhaps, but a terrible ranger.  Overwhelmingly negative response caused them to halfheartedly mutter some guff about maybe putting the animal companion in further down-level, before skipping past it.

Common wisdom (heh!) is that, whatever their success with the rest of the edition, the 5e designers are hopelessly lost when it comes to the ranger, unhealthily fixated on correcting things that aren't broken while ignoring very basic issues that should require very little effort to resolve.  Gentlemen, start your homebrews.

Then, an Unearthed Arcana released the [[Scout]] archetype for the [[Fighter]], who basically has the ranger's best-flavor class feature with superior mechanics backing it up.  [[Derp]].

==Fix It, 5e!==
Never let it be said that WotC doesn't know how to listen for the call of potential money. In September 2016, [[http://media.wizards.com/2016/dnd/downloads/UA_RevisedRanger.pdf a whole new "Ranger, Revised" Unearthed Arcana]] was released. It's a complete revamp from the ground up, basing itself extensively off of a poll about the Ranger's "essential traits" concocted by WotC and with a large prelude explaining that, yes, this will eventually lead to a "Ranger Mk 2" getting a formal release, and no, that won't invalidate the original Ranger if you still want to keep playing it.

So, what's the different about the Revised Ranger? Well...

Natural Explorer is even more awesome than before, no longer limited to a specific terrain type and incorporating many higher-level benefits, like ignoring difficult terrain, right out of the box, along with all the sweet, sweet flavor it always had.

Favored Enemy now grants a +2 damage bonus at level 1 (scaling to +4 damage bonus and advantage on saving throws vs. their attacks at level 6) plus a free language of your choice, with instructions to try to keep it thematic.  But you only get to pick twice, once from the "common" enemy types at 1st level, once from a list of "big game" (Aberrations, Celestials, Constructs, Dragons, Elementals, Fiends or Giants). 

Extra Attack is gone, but it's a component of every archetype but the Beast Conclave.

Primeval Awareness has gone from a useless joke of a class feature to an extremely powerful one, allowing the Ranger to sense any of his favored enemies and a great deal of information about them within a five-mile radius by spending a minute meditating - no spell-slot required!

Instead of Land's Stride, which is now baked right into Natural Explorer, you gain Fleet of Foot at eighth level, which lets you Dash as a bonus action.

Hide in Plain Sight works about the same, but no longer requires a full minute to set up.

Foe Slayer is still the capstone, and now works on anyone, rather than just Favored Enemies.  Still not great, but better.

The Hunter Conclave is literally identical to the Hunter path, with the only difference being that it gets Extra Attack to make up for the base class ''not'' getting it.  

The Stalker Conclave is about the same as the Deep Stalker, though with a few tweaks.  Its 3rd level ability allows it to evade darkvision while hiding rather than giving it the bonus hide action early when it got off an ambush, the mechanics of its own bonus darkvision got heavily tweaked, it gains an extra attack like the Hunter, the language on its Flurry got shifted around a bit, and it can Dodge ''after'' seeing whether or not a hit would connect.  Otherwise, it is largely exactly the same.

Finally, the reason for like 75% of this whole rework, the Beast Conclave, which ''is'' extensively modified from its base version in a number of different ways. For starters, your animal companion is now set (your choice of ape, black bear, boar, giant badger, giant weasel, mule, panther or wolf) rather than being chosen from "any creature with CR 1/4" like in the corebook. It can be restored to life if slain by a ritual that costs 25GP of materials and which takes 8 hours. Although a companion beast loses its Multiattack ablity (something justified in a sidebar as being to avoid making it outshine the party's fighter or [[barbarian]]), it finally can under its own initiative; you can command what it does, but if you can't directly command it, then it'll work things out for itself. It uses your proficiency bonus, is proficient in two skills of your choice gains in hit dice when you gain levels, and increases its own ability scores when you gain a level-based Ability Score Increase.

At 5th level, your Coordinated Attack feature means that your companion can use its reaction to make an attack if it sees you use the Attack action during that turn. Likewise, the 7th level feature, Beast's Defense (companion has advantage on all saving throws) doesn't work unless it can see you. No such weakness applies to its 11th and 15th level features; Storm of Claws and Fangs lets it use its Attack action to dish out a melee strike against every creature within 5 feet of it, whilst Superior Beast's Defense lets it spend its reaction to halve damage from an attack it takes.

{{D&D3-Classes}}
{{D&D4-Classes}}
{{D&D5-Classes}}
{{Pathfinder-Classes}}