Editing
Old Man Henderson
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==The Made-Up Debate== {{skubby}} Now, given all the [[awesome]] that (presumably) took place, as well as the backstory being (conveniently, if you want to phrase it like that) book burned, naturally some people believe ([[That Guy|or are trying to convince others that]]) Henderson's glorious rebellion against GM tyranny is nothing but a false tale. This has led to [[Skub|debate]] among both fa/tg/uys as well as people not on the board on whether Waffle [[The Deciever|fooled everyone into thinking this actually happened]] or not. A common, but flawed argument for the made-up tale theory is that no actual jackass GM would allow such plot derailment to happen. Considering your average DM/GM - not one that's a total asshole - has trouble keeping their party on the right track, would this GM fare any better? Waffle House Millionaire said the players allowed this all to occur (and cooperated at points, such as when they dropped the yacht). Plus the GM could have easily just wanted to see where this was going and thus let their hubris (in this case, their idea that no one could actually challenge their authority) get the better of them. Conversely, another flawed argument is that [[What|if it WAS fake, Henderson would have lived through it all]]. This is again, flawed, as Henderson dying could have been added in for finale dramatics and/or making it seem more believable. Hell, this is more flawed than the argument above, and that's saying something. A much better argument in favor of the story being a fabrication is the simple fact that WHM allegedly created a character who was a blatant homage to someone from a movie he'd never seen, and who had a backstory partly written in a language he didn't speak. So either the tale is at least partly fictious, or WHM was being mentally influenced by an actual supernatural entity of some description. There's a bunch of other arguments that have variable merit, but going through them all would be its own article. Tl;dr: Unless Waffle comes back and says something to confirm one of the sides here, we'll never know if it really happened or not. Not that it really matters, since fictional campaign or not its impact still stands.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to 2d4chan may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
2d4chan:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information