Editing
The Earthsea Cycle
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Film and Television== Now, some more lazy fa/tg/uys and/or ca/tg/irls may not want to read the 860 collective pages of the main series, and may probably go looking for something much more easy to consume. A quick google search of "Earthsea film" will yield two results; The sci-fi channel's "Earthsea" mini-series and studio ghibli's "Tales from Earthsea".<br> The unfortunate result from watching these two would likely be an unwillingness to investigate the books from which they came, and as such, '''watching either of these is unadvised'''. The Sci-fi channel original mini-series is everything you would expect. A poorly produced, cheesily executed, and just plain [[Heresy|bad]] [[skub|skubfest]] that managed to turn the author, sweet old Ursula, into an [[Angry Marine]] due to how bad it was. There are many ways that this adaptation rapes the source material, from the hasty salad-toss story that mixes book one and two together, the terrible acting, cinematography and over-abundance of stock sounds but the biggest and most horrendous offence is how it turns the ethnically diverse and unique setting of Earthsea into some generic, Tolkienesque medieval world, something that, you know, the books were trying to AVOID!!! The much less offensive of the two is the studio ghibli made "Tales from Earthsea" made by the one and only Miyazaki...Goro Miyazaki, that is...Hayao's son. While the name may lead you into thinking it's an adaptation of the short-story collection, don't be fooled, because the main chunk of its story comes from "The Farthest Shore", with a bit of "Tehanu" mixed in...and book one...and book two...yeah. It's kind of a mess.<br> At least, unlike the mini-series it gets the setting and tone right enough, even if there's a bit of ghibli weirdness thrown in. Its biggest problem, however, is that it's just not that entertaining of a movie. To top it all off, it's also clearly not their best animated film, with the animation having a reasonably low frame-rate at times and a noticeable lack of detail compared to their other films. If you absolutely have to, though, as in you're dyselxic and also deaf rendering you physically unable to read the books or listen to the audiobooks, the Ghibli version is the "best" way to go, but not even [[Awesome|Willem Motherfucking Dafoe]] and Timothy [[skub|"the best bond"]] Dalton could make this one a worthy substitute for the original. [[Category:Literature]] [[category:Television]] [[category:Film]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to 2d4chan may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
2d4chan:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information