Editing
ASU-85
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
Created to provide fire support to the VDV, mounting an 85mm cannon and a coaxial MG on a fixed forward mount. ==In Team Yankee== This is going to be an exceptionally cheap fire support option for the VDV, bringing a low AT cannon (probably with HEAT) on a very lightly armored chassis. ==In Real Life== The ASU-85 is an example of a good idea made obsolete by time. Based on the PT-76 Light Tank, the ASU-85 was intended to act as a replacement for the ASU-57 Airborne Tank Destroyer. And to be fair, the design is a pretty neat one...for the 1950s. By the 1960s, this thing was pretty much a waste of space for VDV armories. The problem lies in the configuration. This is an Airborne Assault Gun Vehicle intended to take on the first generation of MBTs in a battlespace that included weapons such as the wire guided anti-tank missiles. It's not surprising that by 1969 the ASU-85 was being replaced with IFVS like the BMD-1. Yet despite this, the vehicle was still kept in service as late as 1993. The Reason you ask? Well pretty much the Same reason the Russian Marines kept the PT-76 for so long. While the vehicle isn't necessarily a good anti-tank platform, it still had a tank cannon capable to deal with hard targets. Remember, this thing can be air dropped onto the battlefield. And in the early stages of an operation, the enemy will probably not have their heavy vehicles ready to react. So having a tank gun on hand can be useful to deal with things like bunkers and emplacements, or to provide close in artillery fire. Now the next question you may be asking is why Soviets went with a WW2 tank destroyer style vehicle as opposed to a traditional tank. Well for starters removing things like the turret helps cut down on weight and height. Compare this to the Sheridan which not only is tall but has thin armor. But there is another reason, a psychological reason. This vehicle is not meant to retreat. Sure, you can go into reverse and fire, but it's not as effective as just turning tail and using the turret to cover your retreat. By design, this thing is intended to either push forward or hold the line. As for users...only the Soviets, Polish, and Vietnam used the vehicle. And even then, only Vietnam still uses it. Yeah, it wasn't that popular of a design. {{Soviet Forces in Team Yankee}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to 2d4chan may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
2d4chan:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Template used on this page:
Template:Soviet Forces in Team Yankee
(
edit
)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information