Beastfolk - Revision history

73.69.193.6: Undo revision 1008493 by 185.243.218.226 (talk)

2026-03-25T23:24:02Z

Undo revision 1008493 by 185.243.218.226 (talk)

Show changes

185.243.218.226: Blanked the page

2026-02-10T23:56:14Z

Blanked the page

Show changes

imported>Administrator: 85 revisions imported

2023-06-17T22:48:52Z

85 revisions imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:48, 17 June 2023
(No difference)

198.48.153.207: Moved incorrectly placed image

2023-05-11T08:19:44Z

Moved incorrectly placed image

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:19, 11 May 2023
Line 194:		Line 194:
	File:Nezumi - Ink-Eyes 6.jpg		File:Nezumi - Ink-Eyes 6.jpg
	File:Feathered Aztec Kobold Spirit Shaman.png		File:Feathered Aztec Kobold Spirit Shaman.png
			File:Catgirl Witch.jpeg
	</gallery>		</gallery>
	</center>		</center>
Line 208:		Line 209:
	Image:1390326966584.jpg		Image:1390326966584.jpg
	Image:Sheepgirl.jpg		Image:Sheepgirl.jpg
	~~File:Catgirl Witch.jpeg~~
	File:Disheveled Catgirl.jpeg		File:Disheveled Catgirl.jpeg
	File:Coy Catgirl.png		File:Coy Catgirl.png

2601:985:4380:3625:4C5C:BE3E:DDAA:2C39 at 12:57, 15 June 2022

2022-06-15T12:57:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:57, 15 June 2022
Line 130:		Line 130:
	* [[Ratatosk]]r (squirrels)		* [[Ratatosk]]r (squirrels)
	* [[Ratfolk]]		* [[Ratfolk]]
			* [[Rhek]]s (rhinos)
	* [[Rougarou]] (wolves)		* [[Rougarou]] (wolves)
	* [[Saurial]]s (dinosaurs)		* [[Saurial]]s (dinosaurs)

1d4chan>Kirbanzo: /* List of Beastfolk */

2022-03-10T03:47:18Z

List of Beastfolk

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:47, 10 March 2022
Line 22:		Line 22:
	'''Non-/tg/ Beastfolk:'''		'''Non-/tg/ Beastfolk:'''
	* [[Burmecian]] (rats)		* [[Burmecian]] (rats)
	* [[Sergal]] (lizard/wolf/shark)		* [[Sergal]] (lizard/wolf/shark; you're on the border of furdom with them though)

	'''[[Warhammer Fantasy]] & [[Warhammer 40,000]] Beastfolk:'''		'''[[Warhammer Fantasy]] & [[Warhammer 40,000]] Beastfolk:'''

1d4chan>Lord Of The Lemmings at 05:09, 26 November 2020

2020-11-26T05:09:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:09, 26 November 2020
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Having beastfolk in your setting, or playing a beastfolk character, isn't inherently bad (though don't say that within earshot of your local [[Commissar]]. Even having some level of sexuality isn't bad - /tg/ can appreciate a [[musclegirl]] in a [[Fantasy Armor\|chainmail bikini]], even if she's wearing it over scales or fur (though many will argue over the amount and distribution of those attributes). [[Magical Realm\|It's when you ramp up the sex level to the point the others at the table are creeped out that you've crossed the line.]] Especially if you claim "persecution" when others call you out on that shit.		Having beastfolk in your setting, or playing a beastfolk character, isn't inherently bad (though don't say that within earshot of your local [[Commissar]]. Even having some level of sexuality isn't bad - /tg/ can appreciate a [[musclegirl]] in a [[Fantasy Armor\|chainmail bikini]], even if she's wearing it over scales or fur (though many will argue over the amount and distribution of those attributes). [[Magical Realm\|It's when you ramp up the sex level to the point the others at the table are creeped out that you've crossed the line.]] Especially if you claim "persecution" when others call you out on that shit.

	Mind you, as much as jokes are made on pages like these, there are ~~[[Commissar\|~~some anons]] on /tg/ who assert that the only "real" way to present beastfolk - or ANY non-human race for that matter - is as [[Beastmen\|mindless ravening monsters who have no culture]] and [[Beastmen (40k)\|exist only to be slain]], insisting that even the slightest hint of culture makes them furry (or if they do have culture make them [[Skaven\|Furry Nazis]]). Most ignore these people, as they are likely just trying to stir shit.		Mind you, as much as jokes are made on pages like these, there are some anons on /tg/ who assert that the only "real" way to present beastfolk - or ANY non-human race for that matter - is as [[Beastmen\|mindless ravening monsters who have no culture]] and [[Beastmen (40k)\|exist only to be slain]], insisting that even the slightest hint of culture makes them furry (or if they do have culture make them [[Skaven\|Furry Nazis]]). Most ignore these people, as they are likely just trying to stir shit.

	==List of Beastfolk==		==List of Beastfolk==

1d4chan>HussarZwei: /* Beastfolk vs. Furries */

2020-11-26T01:40:42Z

Beastfolk vs. Furries

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:40, 26 November 2020
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Having beastfolk in your setting, or playing a beastfolk character, isn't inherently bad (though don't say that within earshot of your local [[Commissar]]. Even having some level of sexuality isn't bad - /tg/ can appreciate a [[musclegirl]] in a [[Fantasy Armor\|chainmail bikini]], even if she's wearing it over scales or fur (though many will argue over the amount and distribution of those attributes). [[Magical Realm\|It's when you ramp up the sex level to the point the others at the table are creeped out that you've crossed the line.]] Especially if you claim "persecution" when others call you out on that shit.		Having beastfolk in your setting, or playing a beastfolk character, isn't inherently bad (though don't say that within earshot of your local [[Commissar]]. Even having some level of sexuality isn't bad - /tg/ can appreciate a [[musclegirl]] in a [[Fantasy Armor\|chainmail bikini]], even if she's wearing it over scales or fur (though many will argue over the amount and distribution of those attributes). [[Magical Realm\|It's when you ramp up the sex level to the point the others at the table are creeped out that you've crossed the line.]] Especially if you claim "persecution" when others call you out on that shit.

	Mind you, as much as jokes are made on pages like these, there are [[~~Comissar~~\|some anons]] on /tg/ who assert that the only "real" way to present beastfolk - or ANY non-human race for that matter - is as [[Beastmen\|mindless ravening monsters who have no culture]] and [[Beastmen (40k)\|exist only to be slain]], insisting that even the slightest hint of culture makes them furry (or if they do have culture make them [[Skaven\|Furry Nazis]]). Most ignore these people, as they are likely just trying to stir shit.		Mind you, as much as jokes are made on pages like these, there are [[Commissar\|some anons]] on /tg/ who assert that the only "real" way to present beastfolk - or ANY non-human race for that matter - is as [[Beastmen\|mindless ravening monsters who have no culture]] and [[Beastmen (40k)\|exist only to be slain]], insisting that even the slightest hint of culture makes them furry (or if they do have culture make them [[Skaven\|Furry Nazis]]). Most ignore these people, as they are likely just trying to stir shit.

	==List of Beastfolk==		==List of Beastfolk==

1d4chan>HussarZwei: /* Beastfolk vs. Furries */

2020-11-26T01:40:25Z

Beastfolk vs. Furries

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:40, 26 November 2020
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Having beastfolk in your setting, or playing a beastfolk character, isn't inherently bad (though don't say that within earshot of your local [[Commissar]]. Even having some level of sexuality isn't bad - /tg/ can appreciate a [[musclegirl]] in a [[Fantasy Armor\|chainmail bikini]], even if she's wearing it over scales or fur (though many will argue over the amount and distribution of those attributes). [[Magical Realm\|It's when you ramp up the sex level to the point the others at the table are creeped out that you've crossed the line.]] Especially if you claim "persecution" when others call you out on that shit.		Having beastfolk in your setting, or playing a beastfolk character, isn't inherently bad (though don't say that within earshot of your local [[Commissar]]. Even having some level of sexuality isn't bad - /tg/ can appreciate a [[musclegirl]] in a [[Fantasy Armor\|chainmail bikini]], even if she's wearing it over scales or fur (though many will argue over the amount and distribution of those attributes). [[Magical Realm\|It's when you ramp up the sex level to the point the others at the table are creeped out that you've crossed the line.]] Especially if you claim "persecution" when others call you out on that shit.

	Mind you, as much as jokes are made on pages like these, there are some anons on /tg/ who assert that the only "real" way to present beastfolk - or ANY non-human race for that matter - is as [[Beastmen\|mindless ravening monsters who have no culture]] and [[Beastmen (40k)\|exist only to be slain]], insisting that even the slightest hint of culture makes them furry (or if they do have culture make them [[Skaven\|Furry Nazis]]). Most ignore these people, as they are likely just trying to stir shit.		Mind you, as much as jokes are made on pages like these, there are [[Comissar\|some anons]] on /tg/ who assert that the only "real" way to present beastfolk - or ANY non-human race for that matter - is as [[Beastmen\|mindless ravening monsters who have no culture]] and [[Beastmen (40k)\|exist only to be slain]], insisting that even the slightest hint of culture makes them furry (or if they do have culture make them [[Skaven\|Furry Nazis]]). Most ignore these people, as they are likely just trying to stir shit.

	==List of Beastfolk==		==List of Beastfolk==

1d4chan>Lord Of The Lemmings: Undo revision 720894 by HussarZwei (talk)

2020-11-22T19:27:49Z

Undo revision 720894 by HussarZwei (talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 22 November 2020
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Having beastfolk in your setting, or playing a beastfolk character, isn't inherently bad (though don't say that within earshot of your local [[Commissar]]. Even having some level of sexuality isn't bad - /tg/ can appreciate a [[musclegirl]] in a [[Fantasy Armor\|chainmail bikini]], even if she's wearing it over scales or fur (though many will argue over the amount and distribution of those attributes). [[Magical Realm\|It's when you ramp up the sex level to the point the others at the table are creeped out that you've crossed the line.]] Especially if you claim "persecution" when others call you out on that shit.		Having beastfolk in your setting, or playing a beastfolk character, isn't inherently bad (though don't say that within earshot of your local [[Commissar]]. Even having some level of sexuality isn't bad - /tg/ can appreciate a [[musclegirl]] in a [[Fantasy Armor\|chainmail bikini]], even if she's wearing it over scales or fur (though many will argue over the amount and distribution of those attributes). [[Magical Realm\|It's when you ramp up the sex level to the point the others at the table are creeped out that you've crossed the line.]] Especially if you claim "persecution" when others call you out on that shit.

	Mind you, as much as jokes are made on pages like these, there are some anons on /tg/ who assert that the only "real" way to present beastfolk - or ANY non-human race for that matter - is as [[Beastmen\|mindless ravening monsters who have no culture]] ~~(or if they do have culture make them [[Skaven\|Furry Nazis]])~~ and [[Beastmen (40k)\|exist only to be slain]], insisting that even the slightest hint of culture makes them furry. Most ignore these people, as they are likely just trying to stir shit.		Mind you, as much as jokes are made on pages like these, there are some anons on /tg/ who assert that the only "real" way to present beastfolk - or ANY non-human race for that matter - is as [[Beastmen\|mindless ravening monsters who have no culture]] and [[Beastmen (40k)\|exist only to be slain]], insisting that even the slightest hint of culture makes them furry (or if they do have culture make them [[Skaven\|Furry Nazis]]). Most ignore these people, as they are likely just trying to stir shit.

	==List of Beastfolk==		==List of Beastfolk==