Mike Mearls - Revision history

imported>Administrator: 30 revisions imported

2023-06-22T12:55:38Z

30 revisions imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:55, 22 June 2023
(No difference)

imported>Administrator: 1 revision imported

2023-06-19T02:44:01Z

1 revision imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:44, 19 June 2023
(No difference)

1d4chan>Chucklenuts at 08:39, 29 June 2022

2022-06-29T08:39:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:39, 29 June 2022
Line 13:		Line 13:
	*Fire arm proficiency being impossible to have, despite the clear presence of firearms and smokepowder based weaponry being present in the forgotten realms and enemies who DO have firearm proficiency.		*Fire arm proficiency being impossible to have, despite the clear presence of firearms and smokepowder based weaponry being present in the forgotten realms and enemies who DO have firearm proficiency.
	*Smokepowder cannot be used with the intent of being made an explosive for offensive reasons such as a makeshift hand grenade, despite their being mechanics for smokepowder going off if handled too roughly by players or being used as ammo for fire arms.		*Smokepowder cannot be used with the intent of being made an explosive for offensive reasons such as a makeshift hand grenade, despite their being mechanics for smokepowder going off if handled too roughly by players or being used as ammo for fire arms.
	*Players are unable to take things they find during their adventures outside of the module. They instead achieve progression points for checking off certain goals outlined in adventure modules. They can then spend these progression points on items they have unlocked. You unlock items for purchase by encountering them in-game. There is no longer gold or treasure that your character can just find and keep. Anything you find while playing a module stays within that module unless you purchase it with points. So if you find a chest ~~full of~~ 500 gold and a magic item, congrats you can't actually keep what you find, you get X number of progression points, you can spend after the fact.		*Players are unable to take things they find during their adventures outside of the module. They instead achieve progression points for checking off certain goals outlined in adventure modules. They can then spend these progression points on items they have unlocked. You unlock items for purchase by encountering them in-game. There is no longer gold or treasure that your character can just find and keep. Anything you find while playing a module stays within that module unless you purchase it with points. So if you find a chest containing 500 gold and a magic item, congrats- you can't actually keep what you find, you instead get X number of progression points that you can spend after the fact.

	On the end of April in 2020, after months of social media silence starting from June, it was revealed on Twitter by [[Jeremy Crawford]] that Mearls had been removed from his position as the head of the tabletop development team, was no longer associated with the tabletop development side of things, and hadn't been for a year. The reasons why were initially unclear - whether he was fired or simply transferred to other parts of WotC, such as on the team developing [[Baldur's Gate (Games)\|Baldur's Gate III]] - was unknown. On May 21st 2020, it was confirmed on the [https://www.twitch.tv/videos/627814944?t=0h23m38s official D&D podcast Dragon Talk] that "Mike Mearls is back full time on the RPG again" and had been "working on some computer game stuff".		On the end of April in 2020, after months of social media silence starting from June, it was revealed on Twitter by [[Jeremy Crawford]] that Mearls had been removed from his position as the head of the tabletop development team, was no longer associated with the tabletop development side of things, and hadn't been for a year. The reasons why were initially unclear - whether he was fired or simply transferred to other parts of WotC, such as on the team developing [[Baldur's Gate (Games)\|Baldur's Gate III]] - was unknown. On May 21st 2020, it was confirmed on the [https://www.twitch.tv/videos/627814944?t=0h23m38s official D&D podcast Dragon Talk] that "Mike Mearls is back full time on the RPG again" and had been "working on some computer game stuff".

	[[Category:Writers]][[Category:Dungeons & Dragons]][[Category:Game Designers]]		[[Category:Writers]][[Category:Dungeons & Dragons]][[Category:Game Designers]]

1d4chan>Zimriel at 15:17, 17 March 2021

2021-03-17T15:17:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:17, 17 March 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:
	'''Mike Mearls''', sometimes "Mike Meals" because as you see from the photo the man hasn't missed many of those, is a designer for [[Wizards of the Coast]]. He became lead developer for ''[[Dungeons & Dragons 4th Edition]]'' in 2009 and co-designer of ''[[Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition]]'' - before [[Monte Cook]] quit due to "personal differences".		'''Mike Mearls''', sometimes "Mike Meals" because as you see from the photo the man hasn't missed many of those, is a designer for [[Wizards of the Coast]]. He became lead developer for ''[[Dungeons & Dragons 4th Edition]]'' in 2009 and co-designer of ''[[Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition]]'' - before [[Monte Cook]] quit due to "personal differences".

	Over the d20 era Mearls' earlier work includes ''Portals & Planes'' for ''Legends & Lairs''. He further worked closely with Monte himself on ''[[Arcana Unearthed]]'' - ~~for~~ which ~~output the best we can say is~~ that ~~it followed the standard~~.		Over the d20 era Mearls' earlier work includes ''Portals & Planes'' for ''Legends & Lairs''. He further worked closely with Monte himself on ''[[Arcana Unearthed]]'' - which limits he tested, such that Malhavoc stuck his ideas in separate books ''not'' cited by any ''AU'' author named other than "Mearls".

	On the Mearls / Cook split in 5e, Cook stated "I want to take this time to stress that my differences were not with my fellow designers, Rob Schwalb and [[Bruce Cordell]]. I enjoyed every moment of working with them over the past year. I have faith that they'll create a fun game. I'm rooting for them." The community noticed the omission of Mike Mearls in this statement and assumed this was due to the rumored friction that resulted in Cook's departure. Fans disagree on whom was at fault in the apparent disagreements between the two. Mearls' recent move from lead developer on 4th Edition to co-designer in 5th Edition is considered a demotion. That would imply that senior members like [[Chris Perkins]] saw decisions made by Mearls during 4th edition as a detriment to the game. Recent comments by Mearls suggesting the removal of mechanics like bonus actions the resulting negative reactions by fans suggest this demotion was just, as the general consensus that removing such a key component of the game would break many of the classes who rely on it ([https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/955153201434525696 the implication that] people who opposed such a move were misogynist "gatekeepers" didn't win him any fans). [https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/1041059458888028160 He considers 3rd edition and 4th editions to have a "fatal flaw" of being too modular]. People wouldn't really care about this, but his lead in was [https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/1041036499146305536 saying people who liked such a thing were "assholes" and "obnoxious people" while games with such were a "game for assholes"].		On the Mearls / Cook split in 5e, Cook stated "I want to take this time to stress that my differences were not with my fellow designers, Rob Schwalb and [[Bruce Cordell]]. I enjoyed every moment of working with them over the past year. I have faith that they'll create a fun game. I'm rooting for them." The community noticed the omission of Mike Mearls in this statement and assumed this was due to the rumored friction that resulted in Cook's departure. Fans disagree on whom was at fault in the apparent disagreements between the two. Mearls' recent move from lead developer on 4th Edition to co-designer in 5th Edition is considered a demotion. That would imply that senior members like [[Chris Perkins]] saw decisions made by Mearls during 4th edition as a detriment to the game. Recent comments by Mearls suggesting the removal of mechanics like bonus actions the resulting negative reactions by fans suggest this demotion was just, as the general consensus that removing such a key component of the game would break many of the classes who rely on it ([https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/955153201434525696 the implication that] people who opposed such a move were misogynist "gatekeepers" didn't win him any fans). [https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/1041059458888028160 He considers 3rd edition and 4th editions to have a "fatal flaw" of being too modular]. People wouldn't really care about this, but his lead in was [https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/1041036499146305536 saying people who liked such a thing were "assholes" and "obnoxious people" while games with such were a "game for assholes"].

1d4chan>Zimriel at 19:16, 27 June 2020

2020-06-27T19:16:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:16, 27 June 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:MikeMearls2012Ennies.jpg\|thumb\|right\|The man himself. Note: does not actually have a light fixture sticking out of the back of his head.]]		[[File:MikeMearls2012Ennies.jpg\|thumb\|right\|The man himself. Note: does not actually have a light fixture sticking out of the back of his head.]]
	A designer for [[Wizards of the Coast]] ~~who~~ became lead developer for ''[[Dungeons & Dragons 4th Edition]]'' in 2009 and co-designer of ''[[Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition]]'', before [[Monte Cook]] quit due to "personal differences" stating "I want to take this time to stress that my differences were not with my fellow designers, Rob Schwalb and Bruce Cordell. I enjoyed every moment of working with them over the past year. I have faith that they'll create a fun game. I'm rooting for them." The community noticed the omission of Mike Meals in this statement and assumed this was due to the rumored friction that resulted in Cook's departure. Fans disagree on whom was at fault in the apparent disagreements between the two, but Mearls' recent move from lead developer on 4th Edition to co-designer in 5th Edition suggests senior members like [[Chris Perkins]] saw decisions made by Mearls during 4th edition as a detriment to the game. Recent comments by Mearls suggesting the removal of mechanics like bonus actions the resulting negative reactions by fans would seem to suggest this was the right decision, as the general consensus that removing such a key component of the game would break many of the classes who rely on it ([https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/955153201434525696 the implication that] people who opposed such a move were misogynist "gatekeepers" didn't win him any fans). [https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/1041059458888028160 He considers 3rd edition and 4th editions to have a "fatal flaw" of being too modular]. People wouldn't really care about this, but his lead in was [https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/1041036499146305536 saying people who liked such a thing were "assholes" and "obnoxious people" while games with such were a "game for assholes"].		'''Mike Mearls''', sometimes "Mike Meals" because as you see from the photo the man hasn't missed many of those, is a designer for [[Wizards of the Coast]]. He became lead developer for ''[[Dungeons & Dragons 4th Edition]]'' in 2009 and co-designer of ''[[Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition]]'' - before [[Monte Cook]] quit due to "personal differences".

	This has nevertheless not stopped [[Wizards of the Coast]] from granting Mearls leadership on projects such as the recent "[[Guildmaster's Guide to Ravnica]]", no doubt to keep him busy while members like Perkins do the real work ~~to take D&D to new heights~~. Politics aside, most would say he is batting .500 as 4e, is ~~rightly regarded as a mistake and~~ 5e ~~appears to have achieved~~ tentative acceptance by fans. Mike made a deal with [[Tzeentch]] to create the "Essentials" line, and his stretch as the lead designer of "Guildmaster's Guide to Ravnica" produced a roughly 50/50 split of acceptance among fans (in what appears to be a theme for his work), since he appeared to be making a second attempt at associating D&D with a card game, the first time being 4th edition.		Over the d20 era Mearls' earlier work includes ''Portals & Planes'' for ''Legends & Lairs''. He further worked closely with Monte himself on ''[[Arcana Unearthed]]'' - for which output the best we can say is that it followed the standard.

			On the Mearls / Cook split in 5e, Cook stated "I want to take this time to stress that my differences were not with my fellow designers, Rob Schwalb and [[Bruce Cordell]]. I enjoyed every moment of working with them over the past year. I have faith that they'll create a fun game. I'm rooting for them." The community noticed the omission of Mike Mearls in this statement and assumed this was due to the rumored friction that resulted in Cook's departure. Fans disagree on whom was at fault in the apparent disagreements between the two. Mearls' recent move from lead developer on 4th Edition to co-designer in 5th Edition is considered a demotion. That would imply that senior members like [[Chris Perkins]] saw decisions made by Mearls during 4th edition as a detriment to the game. Recent comments by Mearls suggesting the removal of mechanics like bonus actions the resulting negative reactions by fans suggest this demotion was just, as the general consensus that removing such a key component of the game would break many of the classes who rely on it ([https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/955153201434525696 the implication that] people who opposed such a move were misogynist "gatekeepers" didn't win him any fans). [https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/1041059458888028160 He considers 3rd edition and 4th editions to have a "fatal flaw" of being too modular]. People wouldn't really care about this, but his lead in was [https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/1041036499146305536 saying people who liked such a thing were "assholes" and "obnoxious people" while games with such were a "game for assholes"].

			This has nevertheless not stopped [[Wizards of the Coast]] from granting Mearls leadership on projects such as the recent "[[Guildmaster's Guide to Ravnica]]", no doubt to keep him busy while members like Perkins do the real work. Politics aside, most would say he is batting .500 as 4e is [[skub]] where 5e has earned some tentative acceptance by fans. Mike made a deal with [[Tzeentch]] to create the "Essentials" line, and his stretch as the lead designer of "Guildmaster's Guide to Ravnica" produced a roughly 50/50 split of acceptance among fans (in what appears to be a theme for his work), since he appeared to be making a second attempt at associating D&D with a card game, the first time being 4th edition.

	What he claims is his design philosophy is inspired by the first few editions of the game, which found expression through 5e's many "throwback" game mechanics, and the "Essentials" line's pared-down design. He's also been writing the [[Unearthed Arcana]] articles on the official website, offering new game mechanics and ideas from various sources to be play-tested, plus discussions regarding the results of the official monthly surveys, framing him as the friendly face of 5e, despite the rumored drama with other members like Monte Cook behind the scenes. Mearls also seems to have a firm grip on the operation of the [[Dungeons and Dragons Adventurers' league]]. Recent changes to the rules had a mixed reception, since many of the changes seemed to double down on what typical players already disliked about organized play. The changes in general seemed aimed at players and DMs who would abuse the league's honor system, as well as dropping in on specific modules only to take story-critical items with them and leave the group. While the changes had honorable intentions, when league players and DMs offered input, Mearls refused to budge on the strictness and tediousness of the new rules.		What he claims is his design philosophy is inspired by the first few editions of the game, which found expression through 5e's many "throwback" game mechanics, and the "Essentials" line's pared-down design. He's also been writing the [[Unearthed Arcana]] articles on the official website, offering new game mechanics and ideas from various sources to be play-tested, plus discussions regarding the results of the official monthly surveys, framing him as the friendly face of 5e, despite the rumored drama with other members like Monte Cook behind the scenes. Mearls also seems to have a firm grip on the operation of the [[Dungeons and Dragons Adventurers' league]]. Recent changes to the rules had a mixed reception, since many of the changes seemed to double down on what typical players already disliked about organized play. The changes in general seemed aimed at players and DMs who would abuse the league's honor system, as well as dropping in on specific modules only to take story-critical items with them and leave the group. While the changes had honorable intentions, when league players and DMs offered input, Mearls refused to budge on the strictness and tediousness of the new rules.

43.250.205.89: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/627814944?t=0h23m38s is the direct wotc source for the "firing" story update. Confirmation that he was working on "computer game stuff for [WotC]" and not in fact fired.

2020-06-04T05:28:13Z

https://www.twitch.tv/videos/627814944?t=0h23m38s is the direct wotc source for the "firing" story update. Confirmation that he was working on "computer game stuff for [WotC]" and not in fact fired.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:28, 4 June 2020
Line 11:		Line 11:
	*Players are unable to take things they find during their adventures outside of the module. They instead achieve progression points for checking off certain goals outlined in adventure modules. They can then spend these progression points on items they have unlocked. You unlock items for purchase by encountering them in-game. There is no longer gold or treasure that your character can just find and keep. Anything you find while playing a module stays within that module unless you purchase it with points. So if you find a chest full of 500 gold and a magic item, congrats you can't actually keep what you find, you get X number of progression points, you can spend after the fact.		*Players are unable to take things they find during their adventures outside of the module. They instead achieve progression points for checking off certain goals outlined in adventure modules. They can then spend these progression points on items they have unlocked. You unlock items for purchase by encountering them in-game. There is no longer gold or treasure that your character can just find and keep. Anything you find while playing a module stays within that module unless you purchase it with points. So if you find a chest full of 500 gold and a magic item, congrats you can't actually keep what you find, you get X number of progression points, you can spend after the fact.

	On the end of April in 2020, after months of social media silence starting from June, it was revealed on Twitter by [[Jeremy Crawford]] that Mearls had been removed from his position as the head of the tabletop development team, was no longer associated with the tabletop development side of things, and hadn't been for a year. ~~His ultimate fate~~ - whether he was fired or simply transferred to other parts of WotC, such as on the team developing [[Baldur's Gate (Games)\|Baldur's Gate III]] - ~~remains~~ unknown.		On the end of April in 2020, after months of social media silence starting from June, it was revealed on Twitter by [[Jeremy Crawford]] that Mearls had been removed from his position as the head of the tabletop development team, was no longer associated with the tabletop development side of things, and hadn't been for a year. The reasons why were initially unclear - whether he was fired or simply transferred to other parts of WotC, such as on the team developing [[Baldur's Gate (Games)\|Baldur's Gate III]] - was unknown. On May 21st 2020, it was confirmed on the [https://www.twitch.tv/videos/627814944?t=0h23m38s official D&D podcast Dragon Talk] that "Mike Mearls is back full time on the RPG again" and had been "working on some computer game stuff".

	[[Category:Writers]][[Category:Dungeons & Dragons]][[Category:Game Designers]]		[[Category:Writers]][[Category:Dungeons & Dragons]][[Category:Game Designers]]

1d4chan>QuietBrowser: Tried to cover the whole "fired from WotC" bit. Please tweak to better suit the article.

2020-04-30T22:42:51Z

Tried to cover the whole "fired from WotC" bit. Please tweak to better suit the article.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:42, 30 April 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:
	*Smokepowder cannot be used with the intent of being made an explosive for offensive reasons such as a makeshift hand grenade, despite their being mechanics for smokepowder going off if handled too roughly by players or being used as ammo for fire arms.		*Smokepowder cannot be used with the intent of being made an explosive for offensive reasons such as a makeshift hand grenade, despite their being mechanics for smokepowder going off if handled too roughly by players or being used as ammo for fire arms.
	*Players are unable to take things they find during their adventures outside of the module. They instead achieve progression points for checking off certain goals outlined in adventure modules. They can then spend these progression points on items they have unlocked. You unlock items for purchase by encountering them in-game. There is no longer gold or treasure that your character can just find and keep. Anything you find while playing a module stays within that module unless you purchase it with points. So if you find a chest full of 500 gold and a magic item, congrats you can't actually keep what you find, you get X number of progression points, you can spend after the fact.		*Players are unable to take things they find during their adventures outside of the module. They instead achieve progression points for checking off certain goals outlined in adventure modules. They can then spend these progression points on items they have unlocked. You unlock items for purchase by encountering them in-game. There is no longer gold or treasure that your character can just find and keep. Anything you find while playing a module stays within that module unless you purchase it with points. So if you find a chest full of 500 gold and a magic item, congrats you can't actually keep what you find, you get X number of progression points, you can spend after the fact.

			On the end of April in 2020, after months of social media silence starting from June, it was revealed on Twitter by [[Jeremy Crawford]] that Mearls had been removed from his position as the head of the tabletop development team, was no longer associated with the tabletop development side of things, and hadn't been for a year. His ultimate fate - whether he was fired or simply transferred to other parts of WotC, such as on the team developing [[Baldur's Gate (Games)\|Baldur's Gate III]] - remains unknown.

	[[Category:Writers]][[Category:Dungeons & Dragons]][[Category:Game Designers]]		[[Category:Writers]][[Category:Dungeons & Dragons]][[Category:Game Designers]]

104.49.177.142 at 17:11, 24 April 2019

2019-04-24T17:11:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 24 April 2019
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*Fire arm proficiency being impossible to have, despite the clear presence of firearms and smokepowder based weaponry being present in the forgotten realms and enemies who DO have firearm proficiency.		*Fire arm proficiency being impossible to have, despite the clear presence of firearms and smokepowder based weaponry being present in the forgotten realms and enemies who DO have firearm proficiency.
	*Smokepowder cannot be used with the intent of being made an explosive for offensive reasons such as a makeshift hand grenade, despite their being mechanics for smokepowder going off if handled too roughly by players or being used as ammo for fire arms.		*Smokepowder cannot be used with the intent of being made an explosive for offensive reasons such as a makeshift hand grenade, despite their being mechanics for smokepowder going off if handled too roughly by players or being used as ammo for fire arms.
	*Players are unable to take things they find during their adventures outside of the module. They instead ~~gain the~~ gold ~~value of the item if~~ it ~~has one~~. ~~If it does not have~~ a ~~value~~, ~~they cannot~~ keep ~~it or have it outside~~ the ~~adventure it was found in~~.		*Players are unable to take things they find during their adventures outside of the module. They instead achieve progression points for checking off certain goals outlined in adventure modules. They can then spend these progression points on items they have unlocked. You unlock items for purchase by encountering them in-game. There is no longer gold or treasure that your character can just find and keep. Anything you find while playing a module stays within that module unless you purchase it with points. So if you find a chest full of 500 gold and a magic item, congrats you can't actually keep what you find, you get X number of progression points, you can spend after the fact.

	[[Category:Writers]][[Category:Dungeons & Dragons]][[Category:Game Designers]]		[[Category:Writers]][[Category:Dungeons & Dragons]][[Category:Game Designers]]

1d4chan>Agiletek at 02:38, 21 March 2019

2019-03-21T02:38:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:38, 21 March 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:MikeMearls2012Ennies.jpg\|thumb\|right\|The man himself. Note: does not actually have a light fixture sticking out of the back of his head.]]		[[File:MikeMearls2012Ennies.jpg\|thumb\|right\|The man himself. Note: does not actually have a light fixture sticking out of the back of his head.]]
	A designer for [[Wizards of the Coast]] who became lead developer for ''[[Dungeons & Dragons 4th Edition]]'' in 2009 and co-designer of ''[[Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition]]'', before [[Monte Cook]] quit due to "personal differences" stating "I want to take this time to stress that my differences were not with my fellow designers, Rob Schwalb and Bruce Cordell. I enjoyed every moment of working with them over the past year. I have faith that they'll create a fun game. I'm rooting for them." The community noticed the omission of Mike Meals in this statement and assumed this was due to the rumored friction that resulted in Cook's departure. Fans disagree on whom was at fault in the apparent disagreements between the two, but Mearls' recent move from lead developer on 4th Edition to co-designer in 5th Edition suggests senior members like [[Chris Perkins]] saw decisions made by Mearls during 4th edition as a detriment to the game. Recent comments by Mearls suggesting the removal of mechanics like bonus actions the resulting negative reactions by fans would seem to suggest this was the right decision, as the general consensus that removing such a key component of the game would break many of the classes who rely on it ([https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/955153201434525696 the implication that] people who opposed such a move were misogynist "gatekeepers" didn't win him any fans).		A designer for [[Wizards of the Coast]] who became lead developer for ''[[Dungeons & Dragons 4th Edition]]'' in 2009 and co-designer of ''[[Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition]]'', before [[Monte Cook]] quit due to "personal differences" stating "I want to take this time to stress that my differences were not with my fellow designers, Rob Schwalb and Bruce Cordell. I enjoyed every moment of working with them over the past year. I have faith that they'll create a fun game. I'm rooting for them." The community noticed the omission of Mike Meals in this statement and assumed this was due to the rumored friction that resulted in Cook's departure. Fans disagree on whom was at fault in the apparent disagreements between the two, but Mearls' recent move from lead developer on 4th Edition to co-designer in 5th Edition suggests senior members like [[Chris Perkins]] saw decisions made by Mearls during 4th edition as a detriment to the game. Recent comments by Mearls suggesting the removal of mechanics like bonus actions the resulting negative reactions by fans would seem to suggest this was the right decision, as the general consensus that removing such a key component of the game would break many of the classes who rely on it ([https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/955153201434525696 the implication that] people who opposed such a move were misogynist "gatekeepers" didn't win him any fans). [https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/1041059458888028160 He considers 3rd edition and 4th editions to have a "fatal flaw" of being too modular]. People wouldn't really care about this, but his lead in was [https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/1041036499146305536 saying people who liked such a thing were "assholes" and "obnoxious people" while games with such were a "game for assholes"].

	This has nevertheless not stopped [[Wizards of the Coast]] from granting Mearls leadership on projects such as the recent "[[Guildmaster's Guide to Ravnica]]", no doubt to keep him busy while members like Perkins do the real work to take D&D to new heights. Politics aside, most would say he is batting .500 as 4e, is rightly regarded as a mistake and 5e appears to have achieved tentative acceptance by fans. Mike made a deal with [[Tzeentch]] to create the "Essentials" line, and his stretch as the lead designer of "Guildmaster's Guide to Ravnica" produced a roughly 50/50 split of acceptance among fans (in what appears to be a theme for his work), since he appeared to be making a second attempt at associating D&D with a card game, the first time being 4th edition.		This has nevertheless not stopped [[Wizards of the Coast]] from granting Mearls leadership on projects such as the recent "[[Guildmaster's Guide to Ravnica]]", no doubt to keep him busy while members like Perkins do the real work to take D&D to new heights. Politics aside, most would say he is batting .500 as 4e, is rightly regarded as a mistake and 5e appears to have achieved tentative acceptance by fans. Mike made a deal with [[Tzeentch]] to create the "Essentials" line, and his stretch as the lead designer of "Guildmaster's Guide to Ravnica" produced a roughly 50/50 split of acceptance among fans (in what appears to be a theme for his work), since he appeared to be making a second attempt at associating D&D with a card game, the first time being 4th edition.

1d4chan>LGX-000: If you're gonna include something like that, phrase it more honestly

2019-03-21T01:29:41Z

If you're gonna include something like that, phrase it more honestly

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:29, 21 March 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:MikeMearls2012Ennies.jpg\|thumb\|right\|The man himself. Note: does not actually have a light fixture sticking out of the back of his head.]]		[[File:MikeMearls2012Ennies.jpg\|thumb\|right\|The man himself. Note: does not actually have a light fixture sticking out of the back of his head.]]
	A designer for [[Wizards of the Coast]] who became lead developer for ''[[Dungeons & Dragons 4th Edition]]'' in 2009 and co-designer of ''[[Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition]]'', before [[Monte Cook]] quit due to "personal differences" stating "I want to take this time to stress that my differences were not with my fellow designers, Rob Schwalb and Bruce Cordell. I enjoyed every moment of working with them over the past year. I have faith that they'll create a fun game. I'm rooting for them." The community noticed the omission of Mike Meals in this statement and assumed this was due to the rumored friction that resulted in Cook's departure. Fans disagree on whom was at fault in the apparent disagreements between the two, but Mearls' recent move from lead developer on 4th Edition to co-designer in 5th Edition suggests senior members like [[Chris Perkins]] saw decisions made by Mearls during 4th edition as a detriment to the game. Recent comments by Mearls suggesting the removal of mechanics like bonus actions ~~and~~ the resulting negative reactions by fans would seem to suggest this was the right decision, as the general consensus that removing such a key component of the game would break many of the classes who rely on it. ~~This has nevertheless not stopped [[Wizards of~~ the ~~Coast~~]~~] from granting Mearls leadership on projects~~ such ~~as the recent~~ "~~[[Guildmaster~~'~~s Guide to Ravnica]]", no doubt to keep~~ him ~~busy while members like Perkins do the real work to take D&D to new heights~~.		A designer for [[Wizards of the Coast]] who became lead developer for ''[[Dungeons & Dragons 4th Edition]]'' in 2009 and co-designer of ''[[Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition]]'', before [[Monte Cook]] quit due to "personal differences" stating "I want to take this time to stress that my differences were not with my fellow designers, Rob Schwalb and Bruce Cordell. I enjoyed every moment of working with them over the past year. I have faith that they'll create a fun game. I'm rooting for them." The community noticed the omission of Mike Meals in this statement and assumed this was due to the rumored friction that resulted in Cook's departure. Fans disagree on whom was at fault in the apparent disagreements between the two, but Mearls' recent move from lead developer on 4th Edition to co-designer in 5th Edition suggests senior members like [[Chris Perkins]] saw decisions made by Mearls during 4th edition as a detriment to the game. Recent comments by Mearls suggesting the removal of mechanics like bonus actions the resulting negative reactions by fans would seem to suggest this was the right decision, as the general consensus that removing such a key component of the game would break many of the classes who rely on it ([https://twitter.com/mikemearls/status/955153201434525696 the implication that] people who opposed such a move were misogynist "gatekeepers" didn't win him any fans).

	Politics aside most would say he is batting .500 as 4e is rightly regarded as a mistake and 5e appears to have achieved tentative acceptance by fans. He made a deal with [[Tzeentch]] to create the "Essentials" line~~. He was also~~ the lead designer of "[[Guildmaster's Guide to Ravnica]]" ~~which,~~ in what appears to be a theme for his work, ~~produced a roughly 50/50 split of acceptance among fans~~ since he appeared to be making a second attempt at associating D&D with a card game, the first time being 4th edition.		This has nevertheless not stopped [[Wizards of the Coast]] from granting Mearls leadership on projects such as the recent "[[Guildmaster's Guide to Ravnica]]", no doubt to keep him busy while members like Perkins do the real work to take D&D to new heights. Politics aside, most would say he is batting .500 as 4e, is rightly regarded as a mistake and 5e appears to have achieved tentative acceptance by fans. Mike made a deal with [[Tzeentch]] to create the "Essentials" line, and his stretch as the lead designer of "Guildmaster's Guide to Ravnica" produced a roughly 50/50 split of acceptance among fans (in what appears to be a theme for his work), since he appeared to be making a second attempt at associating D&D with a card game, the first time being 4th edition.

	What he claims is his design philosophy is inspired by the first few editions of the game, which found expression through 5e's many "throwback" game mechanics, and the "Essentials" line's pared-down design. He's also been writing the [[Unearthed Arcana]] articles on the official website, offering new game mechanics and ideas from various sources to be play-tested, plus discussions regarding the results of the official monthly surveys, framing him as the friendly face of 5e, despite the rumored drama with other members like Monte Cook behind the scenes. Mearls also seems to have a firm grip on the operation of the [[Dungeons and Dragons Adventurers' league]]. Recent changes to the rules had a mixed reception since many of the changes seemed to double down on what typical players already disliked about organized play. The changes in general seemed aimed at players and ~~DM's~~ who would abuse the league's honor system as well as dropping in on specific modules only to take story-critical items with them and leave the group. While the changes had honorable intentions, when league players and ~~Dm's~~ offered input, Mearls refused to budge of the strictness and tediousness of the new rules. A few other small restrictions of seeming dislike among players are as follows: Fire arm proficiency being impossible to have, despite the clear presence of firearms and smokepowder based weaponry being present in the forgotten realms and enemies who DO have firearm proficiency. Smokepowder cannot be used with the intent of being made an explosive for offensive reasons such as a makeshift hand grenade, despite their being mechanics for smokepowder going off if handled too roughly by players or being used as ammo for fire arms. Players are unable to take things they find during their adventures outside of the module. They instead gain the gold value of the item if it has one. If it does not have a value, they cannot keep it or have it outside the adventure it was found in.[[Category:Writers]][[Category:Dungeons & Dragons]][[Category:Game Designers]]		What he claims is his design philosophy is inspired by the first few editions of the game, which found expression through 5e's many "throwback" game mechanics, and the "Essentials" line's pared-down design. He's also been writing the [[Unearthed Arcana]] articles on the official website, offering new game mechanics and ideas from various sources to be play-tested, plus discussions regarding the results of the official monthly surveys, framing him as the friendly face of 5e, despite the rumored drama with other members like Monte Cook behind the scenes. Mearls also seems to have a firm grip on the operation of the [[Dungeons and Dragons Adventurers' league]]. Recent changes to the rules had a mixed reception, since many of the changes seemed to double down on what typical players already disliked about organized play. The changes in general seemed aimed at players and DMs who would abuse the league's honor system, as well as dropping in on specific modules only to take story-critical items with them and leave the group. While the changes had honorable intentions, when league players and DMs offered input, Mearls refused to budge on the strictness and tediousness of the new rules.

			A few other small restrictions of seeming dislike among players are as follows:
			*Fire arm proficiency being impossible to have, despite the clear presence of firearms and smokepowder based weaponry being present in the forgotten realms and enemies who DO have firearm proficiency.
			*Smokepowder cannot be used with the intent of being made an explosive for offensive reasons such as a makeshift hand grenade, despite their being mechanics for smokepowder going off if handled too roughly by players or being used as ammo for fire arms.
			*Players are unable to take things they find during their adventures outside of the module. They instead gain the gold value of the item if it has one. If it does not have a value, they cannot keep it or have it outside the adventure it was found in.

			[[Category:Writers]][[Category:Dungeons & Dragons]][[Category:Game Designers]]