Sword: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

7 March 2017

26 February 2017

13 February 2017

8 February 2017

20 January 2017

17 January 2017

16 January 2017

  • curprev 10:0710:07, 16 January 2017 1d4chan>Tactical Mehren 86,336 bytes −408 As listed in my talk page why: It just draws out the point that buster swords cannot be effectively wielded in combat for too long and the spelling and grammar is sub-par. undo

13 January 2017

  • curprev 14:0414:04, 13 January 2017 1d4chan>BloodyStupidJohnson 86,744 bytes +1,207 The two versions says totally different things, one is correct and the other is not - and the spelling isn't bad either. undo
  • curprev 13:4613:46, 13 January 2017 1d4chan>Tactical Mehren 85,537 bytes −1,207 That is literally just more nitpicking about the realism of a fantasy-exclusive weapon that was aptly summarized to be incredibly unwieldy and has little real-world combat application. Only longer and with horrendous spelling. undo
  • curprev 13:3013:30, 13 January 2017 1d4chan>BloodyStupidJohnson 86,744 bytes +1,196 The previous guy kinda missed the whole point of the paragraph he deleted. undo
  • curprev 03:0603:06, 13 January 2017 1d4chan>Tactical Mehren 85,548 bytes −1,139 The last two paragraphs just kinda repeated what was written above it, only longer. undo

5 January 2017

24 December 2016

8 December 2016

24 November 2016

17 November 2016

16 November 2016

14 November 2016

13 November 2016

2 November 2016

16 October 2016

15 October 2016

9 October 2016

8 October 2016

6 October 2016

25 September 2016

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)