H.P. Lovecraft: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

17 October 2019

  • curprev 22:2922:29, 17 October 2019 1d4chan>Triacom 10,207 bytes +151 Undo revision 607240 by TheBadageBoys (talk) - It gives context for his character. If you're going to try and do this again without using the talk page then I can ask for another ban. undo
  • curprev 22:2422:24, 17 October 2019 1d4chan>TheBadageBoys 10,056 bytes −151 We're opening it up again. What does this add with the new formatting? Why do we need to include something like "Btw he was racist"? undo
  • curprev 01:1501:15, 17 October 2019 1d4chan>Triacom 10,207 bytes +151 Undo revision 606932 by TheBadageBoys (talk) - No, we've discussed it, we've settled it. End of story. undo
  • curprev 01:1201:12, 17 October 2019 1d4chan>TheBadageBoys 10,056 bytes −151 Before a change of formatting. What's there is enough. If someone wants to think Lovecraft was a racist, "foreigners are weird and give birth to monsters" is enough. Including an interjection with how the content's changed feels extremely unnecessary. undo
  • curprev 01:1001:10, 17 October 2019 1d4chan>Triacom 10,207 bytes +151 Undo revision 606926 by TheBadageBoys (talk) - We've gone over this several times. Yes we need it. undo
  • curprev 00:5600:56, 17 October 2019 1d4chan>TheBadageBoys 10,056 bytes −151 With the reformatting do we even need this? I think what's there is enough without saying anything judgemental/good/bad about Lovecraft. undo

24 September 2019

  • curprev 14:5514:55, 24 September 2019 1d4chan>LGX-000 10,207 bytes +101 Let's make this less of a formatting disaster - and while we're at it, I decided I'd rewrite that one contentious bit so that while it's not underselling how racist he was, it's also not as *overly* judgmental undo

22 September 2019

7 September 2019

29 August 2019

28 August 2019

24 August 2019

21 August 2019

19 August 2019

17 August 2019

16 August 2019

15 August 2019

1 August 2019

17 July 2019

3 July 2019

  • curprev 07:3607:36, 3 July 2019 1d4chan>Triacom 8,396 bytes +49 Undo revision 584909 by TheBadageBoys (talk) - Oh fuck off. This is the phrase you said you were fine with last time. undo
  • curprev 01:3201:32, 3 July 2019 1d4chan>TheBadageBoys 8,347 bytes −49 The reasoning is the same. Slapping "racism" on there doesn't contribute anything nor is it relevant to the article as a whole. We should take this to the talk page. undo

2 July 2019

  • curprev 09:5409:54, 2 July 2019 1d4chan>LGX-000 8,396 bytes +49 This is literally a repeat of the last episode we had on this. Unless you have far more compelling reasoning than you did that time (if AT ALL) then you know how this ends undo
  • curprev 06:5906:59, 2 July 2019 1d4chan>TheBadageBoys 8,347 bytes −49 His views are mentioned already. We don't need to slap racism on there for no real reason. I know this has been talked about before, but I feel now it just doesn't belong. undo

29 June 2019

  • curprev 02:0902:09, 29 June 2019 1d4chan>LGX-000 8,396 bytes +49 We discussed this already. Plus how are you going to mentioned his neuroses but omit his views? undo

28 June 2019

21 June 2019

18 June 2019

18 May 2019

17 May 2019

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)