Approved Literature: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

1 August 2022

31 July 2022

28 July 2022

27 July 2022

26 July 2022

24 July 2022

23 July 2022

  • curprev 11:0611:06, 23 July 2022 1d4chan>Blajbara m 63,552 bytes −1 Ah, here we go with the name-calling, i never stated that the book is 100% accurate and i brought up ''whites'' since your quip about hollywood gave off airs of ''Egyptians were white/black'' (semitic with varying skin colors actually). I have read the books at least twice though a few years ago. I can get in touch with an egyptologist so we can settle this non-issue, though i would urge you to use the talk page in the future since this is getting quite unwieldy. undo
  • curprev 10:3010:30, 23 July 2022 83.10.78.83 talk 63,553 bytes −1 Undo revision 837319 by 83.10.78.83 (talk)I mean seriously, how dumb one can be? We know for sure the society as described is wrong. We know for sure the religious customs as described are wrong. We know for sure the customs and traditions as described are wrong. And what do you bring up? Fucking whites, out of the blue, befitting a retard that doesn't even know WHY the book is dated, for he never read it, but flexes anyway undo
  • curprev 10:2510:25, 23 July 2022 83.10.78.83 talk 63,554 bytes +1 Undo revision 837284 by Blajbara (talk)Your lack of reading comprehension is amazing, mate undo
  • curprev 09:0809:08, 23 July 2022 1d4chan>Blajbara m 63,553 bytes −1 Tfw someone is so miffed at ''hollywood white egyptians'' that they cannot stand ''not 100% correct'' vs. ''much of it is of little value''. Some egyptologists say that it is fine for what it is and that the work is fine for what it is with ok-ish accuracy. I can give you an email of my college professor who had generally praised the books so you can argue with him if you'd like. undo
  • curprev 07:3207:32, 23 July 2022 83.10.78.83 talk 63,554 bytes −1 Seriously people, do you even read the fucking books you recommend? undo
  • curprev 07:2907:29, 23 July 2022 83.10.78.83 talk 63,555 bytes −640 Both Egyptian and Etruscan are INCREDIBLY dated when it comes to "what we know now" and "what we knew in the 1930s" - the entire fucking "Egypt as seen by Hollywood" is by-product of "The Egyptian" undo
  • curprev 06:2506:25, 23 July 2022 188.129.69.218 talk 64,195 bytes −10 Historical Fiction: the books still offer a fair representation of those historical societies, we did not discover that the ancients used motorbikes or spoke in brooklyn afro-american accents undo
  • curprev 06:2006:20, 23 July 2022 188.129.69.218 talk 64,205 bytes +609 Fantasy: maybe look into the talk page next time undo

22 July 2022

21 July 2022

20 July 2022

19 July 2022

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)