Overcosted: Revision history

22 June 2023

• curprev 14:1514:15, 22 June 2023 imported>Administrator m 1,414 bytes 0 20 revisions imported undo

19 June 2023

• curprev 02:5402:54, 19 June 2023 imported>Administrator m 1,414 bytes 0 1 revision imported undo

14 July 2021

• curprev 10:2010:20, 14 July 2021 2406:3400:20f:ffc0:f870:3aa4:3b82:435c talk 1,414 bytes +1,414 →Examples of Overcosted Things undo

24 January 2021

• curprev 19:5519:55, 24 January 2021 178.45.223.1 talk 1,372 bytes +18 No edit summary undo

5 May 2018

• curprev 10:2710:27, 5 May 2018 1d4chan>Ben m 1,354 bytes +34 →Examples of Overcosted Things undo

24 April 2017

• curprev 10:2410:24, 24 April 2017 43.225.61.21 talk 1,320 bytes +23 →Examples of Overcosted Things undo

16 February 2017

• curprev 22:1622:16, 16 February 2017 134.154.250.243 talk 1,297 bytes +34 No edit summary undo

11 October 2016

• curprev 11:1411:14, 11 October 2016 1d4chan>PSC Wintergreen 1,263 bytes +7 →Examples of Overcosted Things undo

17 November 2015

• curprev 23:2123:21, 17 November 2015 1d4chan>Asorel 1,256 bytes +37 Thank you for providing a coherent argument, rather than a nonsensical sperg. Your point is valid, and I have been convinced. undo
• curprev 23:1823:18, 17 November 2015 1d4chan>Evilexecutive 1,219 bytes +1,209 Undo revision 314317 by Asorel (talk)HOly shit, why the hell would you delete a useful Link-page? This is something that's about as useful in wiki edits as Rape, Distraction Carnifex, Rage, and Derp undo
• curprev 23:1223:12, 17 November 2015 1d4chan>Asorel 10 bytes −1,209 Again, defending the honor of page creators is not grounds for keeping a useless page active. What they think is irrelevant if it is not reflective of reality. undo
• curprev 22:3922:39, 17 November 2015 1d4chan>Triacom 1,219 bytes +1,209 Undo revision 314304 by Asorel (talk) - Of course not, however it's a very common term here, so if they thought they should be informative, then let them. undo
• curprev 22:3322:33, 17 November 2015 1d4chan>Asorel 10 bytes −1,209 Yes, it is. I don't give a shit if they 'thought' it was necessary, that doesn't make it so. Is that the entire pretense of your white knighting? Protecting the fee-fees of the poor, innocent contributors? undo
• curprev 22:2922:29, 17 November 2015 1d4chan>Triacom 1,219 bytes +1,181 Undo revision 314298 by Asorel (talk) - Of course not, however there's no reason deleting an article written by somebody else if they wanted to explain something. undo
• curprev 22:1222:12, 17 November 2015 1d4chan>Asorel 38 bytes −1,181 Are you so retarded that you need an entire article explaining what "over" and "costed" mean to you? undo
• curprev 21:5421:54, 17 November 2015 1d4chan>Triacom 1,219 bytes +1,209 Undo revision 314286 by Asorel (talk) - This is even more /tg/ related then many things you've marked for deletion. undo
• curprev 21:2921:29, 17 November 2015 1d4chan>Asorel 10 bytes −1,209 self explanatory undo

5 October 2015

• curprev 16:3016:30, 5 October 2015 1d4chan>PlasmaTalon m 1,219 bytes +155 →Examples of Overcosted Things undo

31 December 2014

• curprev 14:3614:36, 31 December 2014 1d4chan>PlasmaTalon m 1,064 bytes +274 →Examples of Overcosted Things undo

28 February 2014

• curprev 03:1703:17, 28 February 2014 169.233.101.195 talk 790 bytes +19 No edit summary undo

3 June 2013

• curprev 23:3023:30, 3 June 2013 1d4chan>Petro 771 bytes +38 No edit summary undo
• curprev 22:2122:21, 3 June 2013 1d4chan>Mezmerro 733 bytes 0 →Examples of Overcosted Things undo
• curprev 22:1022:10, 3 June 2013 1d4chan>Petro 733 bytes +733 Created page with "In tabletop games overcosted is a term used to refer to assets that are too difficult to deploy for the value they provide. Intentionally contrasted with "overpriced", whi..."