Raider: Revision history

22 June 2023

• curprev 15:2115:21, 22 June 2023 imported>Administrator m 4,511 bytes 0 19 revisions imported undo

19 June 2023

• curprev 03:2003:20, 19 June 2023 imported>Administrator m 4,511 bytes 0 1 revision imported undo

3 June 2023

• curprev 14:4714:47, 3 June 2023 2a02:1810:4e2c:a900:e46d:77bb:eec1:5e6f talk 4,511 bytes +4,511 No edit summary undo

25 April 2021

• curprev 10:4610:46, 25 April 2021 1d4chan>Derpysaurus 4,516 bytes +21 →Overview undo
• curprev 10:4610:46, 25 April 2021 1d4chan>Derpysaurus 4,495 bytes +135 →Overview undo

18 September 2020

• curprev 00:3500:35, 18 September 2020 1d4chan>Piroko 4,360 bytes +16 →Overview undo

28 August 2020

• curprev 14:1514:15, 28 August 2020 1d4chan>Ћ Professional 4,344 bytes +27 →Overview undo

10 August 2020

• curprev 13:4013:40, 10 August 2020 1d4chan>Ћ Professional 4,317 bytes +102 →Overview undo

10 January 2020

• curprev 06:5406:54, 10 January 2020 1d4chan>Cavgunner 4,215 bytes +1 grammar undo

6 January 2020

• curprev 07:2907:29, 6 January 2020 1d4chan>Cavgunner 4,214 bytes −24 Edited article based upon discussion undo

6 December 2019

• curprev 01:1401:14, 6 December 2019 203.40.190.217 talk 4,238 bytes +1,550 Undo revision 618949 by Cavgunner (talk) No. Explain the reason for your edit on your talk page, because multiple people disagree with it. undo
• curprev 01:0901:09, 6 December 2019 1d4chan>Cavgunner 2,688 bytes −1,550 Well sir, neither of us are the sole keepers of what counts as 4chan's flavor. I clearly explained the reasoning for my edit. Now, if there are specific points you wish to contest beyond "omg edit bad," please open a page and I will happily participate. undo
• curprev 00:4700:47, 6 December 2019 203.40.190.217 talk 4,238 bytes +1,550 Undo revision 618945 by Cavgunner (talk) It stays unless you can use the talk page to explain why it has to be removed. You don't get to make your edit and then say any revert is discussed first undo
• curprev 00:4500:45, 6 December 2019 1d4chan>Cavgunner 2,688 bytes −1,550 Look, piling loads of shit upon shit isn't "commentary" and it doesn't make for a good article in ANY context. If you disagree, let's take it to discussion. undo
• curprev 00:3000:30, 6 December 2019 2600:1015:b011:1d72:53dd:3f2e:e742:e1e2 talk 4,238 bytes +1,550 Undo revision 618899 by Cavgunner (talk) this isn't the 40k fanwiki or Lexicanum. Commentary by fa/tg/uys is part of why 40k pages exist, not just links to Lexicanum. undo

5 December 2019

• curprev 19:5719:57, 5 December 2019 1d4chan>Cavgunner 2,688 bytes −1,550 Too many unnecessary, redundant side-comments and useless comparisons. undo

5 March 2019

• curprev 14:5914:59, 5 March 2019 1d4chan>Derpysaurus 4,238 bytes +12 No edit summary undo

12 January 2019

• curprev 20:5220:52, 12 January 2019 2601:1c0:5c80:28ef:a017:4e0d:fc:f0f4 talk 4,226 bytes +411 No edit summary undo

16 October 2018

• curprev 12:2612:26, 16 October 2018 1d4chan>The Hat That Was m 3,815 bytes +22 No edit summary undo

30 December 2017

• curprev 17:0917:09, 30 December 2017 1d4chan>Derpysaurus 3,793 bytes −166 Flexibility and adaptability shits on both. Its why MBTs have replaced both light and heavy tanks. undo

16 June 2017

• curprev 21:1121:11, 16 June 2017 69.26.73.185 talk 3,959 bytes +618 No edit summary undo

20 July 2016

• curprev 04:4004:40, 20 July 2016 1d4chan>Derpysaurus 3,341 bytes +3,341 Created page with "File:Raider.jpg|400px|right|thumb|<span style='color:purple;font-size:100%'>''TO THE LOCAL IMPERIUM FAST FOOD DELI RESTAURANT BOYS! AND NO! WE AREN'T GOING TO BUY''</span> '..."