User talk:2d4fag: Difference between revisions

From 2d4chan
Latest comment: Yesterday at 15:59 by PrincessLoverEleventeen in topic Compromised Historical Preservation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:


:Yes they were cluttering. They line up in a big stack at the top of the page and don't really serve a useful or entertaining purpose. [[User:2d4fag|2d4fag]] ([[User talk:2d4fag|talk]]) 14:15, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
:Yes they were cluttering. They line up in a big stack at the top of the page and don't really serve a useful or entertaining purpose. [[User:2d4fag|2d4fag]] ([[User talk:2d4fag|talk]]) 14:15, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
== Compromised Historical Preservation ==
i extraneously disapprove of both the campaign & /tg/heim's erasure, what kind of archive does that?, in any case if you are sticking to your guns, a simple search will reveal that there are still 30 pages related to /tg/heim if you search for it & a lot more linking to campaigns, in fact one escaped your nuking [[TG/heim:_The_Forsaken_of_Mermedus_(Norse_Warband)]], you should have blocked editing of them after adding a warning that they are left as historical records instead of deleting them, you disgust me.
as an aside, i know it was barebone(singular), but is what was done to the [[Fatemasters]] page really acceptable? [[User:PrincessLoverEleventeen|PrincessLoverEleventeen]] ([[User talk:PrincessLoverEleventeen|talk]]) 15:59, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:59, 20 February 2025

Spice and Wolf

Why was the page cut, especially since it was there when 2d4 came back (and was part of it's gimmick ad)? Plus it leaves red links all across the 2d4 46.205.196.189 18:46, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

RE: Remove those joke templates they put at the top of the page

Outta curiosity, what was wrong with the joke templates to start? Were they considered cluttering or what? 50.65.212.96 00:45, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Yes they were cluttering. They line up in a big stack at the top of the page and don't really serve a useful or entertaining purpose. 2d4fag (talk) 14:15, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Compromised Historical Preservation

i extraneously disapprove of both the campaign & /tg/heim's erasure, what kind of archive does that?, in any case if you are sticking to your guns, a simple search will reveal that there are still 30 pages related to /tg/heim if you search for it & a lot more linking to campaigns, in fact one escaped your nuking TG/heim:_The_Forsaken_of_Mermedus_(Norse_Warband), you should have blocked editing of them after adding a warning that they are left as historical records instead of deleting them, you disgust me.

as an aside, i know it was barebone(singular), but is what was done to the Fatemasters page really acceptable? PrincessLoverEleventeen (talk) 15:59, 20 February 2025 (UTC)Reply