Fantasy Armor: Difference between revisions

From 2d4chan
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1d4chan>Newerfag
Beginning the first steps needed for cleanup. It's going to be a long, painful rewrite, I can tell.
1d4chan>Newerfag
Line 14: Line 14:
File:Biggerpenisarmor.jpg|Nevar enough girth!
File:Biggerpenisarmor.jpg|Nevar enough girth!
File:Female-gladiator-statue.jpg
File:Female-gladiator-statue.jpg
File:Muscle_Cuirass.jpg|Another venerable example of Nipple Armor.  
File:Muscle_Cuirass.jpg|Another venerable example of Nipple Armor, [[Blood Angels]]-approved thousands of years before they ever existed.  
File:Roman_Gladiator_Armor.jpg. The exposed chest is considered to be the combatant's badge of pride. If you've pierced that, you've stabbed him right in his honor. [[Oglaf| No, his ''other'' honor!]]
File:Roman_Gladiator_Armor.jpg. The exposed chest is considered to be the combatant's badge of pride. If you've pierced that, you've stabbed him right in his honor. [[Oglaf| No, his ''other'' honor!]]



Revision as of 05:41, 25 August 2015

This article or section is being fought over by people undoing each other's changes.
Please use the Discussion page for fighting instead of the article.
This page is in need of cleanup. Srsly. It's a fucking mess.

>

A common trend in trafitional games is for armor to put an emphasis on from at the expense of function. The rule of "because it's cool" usually keeps the suspension of disbelief under control, but there are cases where it simply looks too stupid to work yet somehow manages to do so anyway.

See Also

Gallery