Freakshit

In short: any race that seems designed to appeal to special snowflake abusing players and/or Furries.

Like Mary Sue, there's a lot of debate about what does and does not count as "freakshit", so getting people to agree on what does and doesn't qualify is skubalicious. It can and has been stretched over just about any new or non-standard D&D race that seems too edgy and/or too off the beaten track or non-traditional.

If it seems like we dislike the word, well, given that we're frequently caught between the Devil and the Deep Blue Skub of political arguments (and make no mistake: "Freakshit" pretty much directly invites such political bickering), you shouldn't be that surprised we, at this wiki at least, are somewhat wary.

We list the following only out of a desire to document the common use of the term, not out of any approval of any particular usage of it, or the word in general:

• The most notable example is probably Shardmind, the race for which the word was coined. There have been "weird for weird's sake" races before and since, but none have inspired as many "who the fuck would want to play that?" reactions as the Shardmind. That it came about in a particularly controversial edition of the game did it no favors.
• Dragonborn get it often and thick, due to a combination of their being, unlike most such races, core player options, being "scalies" and therefore potentially tied to the "furry" phenomenon, and finally, also being introduced in and associated with said controversial edition.
• Tieflings, alongside dragonborn, are generally the "face" of the freakshit crowd on /tg/, since they are so often drawn by tumblr artists who delight in making them flamboyantly colored and cartoony looking, essentially taking on the role of the "sparkledog" design style that was associated with the furry crowd in the 90s. They may also be prominently associated with some annoying politics-based aesthetics, depending on who you ask.
• And of course, all the weird monsters in 3rd edition that had the option to be used as characters despite sometimes not even being humanoid and the terrible level adjustment rules that would make them underpowered compared to normal characters so nobody actually would use them rules as written, such as the Unbodied and the Ixitxachitl.

• And finally, we must consider those among the audience of /tg/ who call anything besides the "classic four" (Human, Halfling, Dwarf, Elf; Gnome is pushing it) as "freakshit". Don't be surprised when these people get called "racist xenophobes" by the usual suspects, and probably deserve it.

Words of Wisdom from an Oldfag

Point of advice from an Oldfag who has seen fights over words like this before: If you're going to use it at all, try and reserve a word like "freakshit" for those races who don't just look nonhuman, but actually inspire the questions "Where's the fucking appeal?", and "Why would anyone want to play this?". You can thereby avoid much of the standard stupid arguments that using such a word will eventually inspire.

To provide a few examples of races that get called "Freakshit" but probably don't deserve it: Dragonborn exist to cater to the "I wanna play a dragon!" feeling that some players have had since the 70s, and Tieflings cater to those who want to either play "obvious Bad Boys/Girls" or "playing with being a victim of racism" types; all of which count as solid, if somewhat stupid, appeals to playing a character type. Similar points can be made for Dhampires (similar to Teiflings) and Goblins (playing a goofy character can be fun).

Remember: Being a non-erotic Furry is not a bad thing, and Monstergirls are popular for a reason; the true Magical Realm line only starts once you add in actual erotica or weird fetish shit.

Further, if a player insists "I'm only playing a Catfolk Dhampire because that's how the build worked out", don't try and contradict them. While they're probably lying, it's still a dick move to push them if they aren't making a big deal about it.