Mary Sue: Difference between revisions

From 2d4chan
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:
It is worth noting, however, that very rare authors have the skill to pull off the Mary Sue, creating a character of such epic awesomeness (Re. Jean Luc Picard) that no one gives a shit.
It is worth noting, however, that very rare authors have the skill to pull off the Mary Sue, creating a character of such epic awesomeness (Re. Jean Luc Picard) that no one gives a shit.


==Negating the Mary Sue==
Mary Sue is something poor writters invented to differenciate poorest writers from themselves so they can feel a bit good about their lack of artistry and verbosity. You are all crap.
Interestingly, there hasn't been really much written about how to defeat a May Sue aside from trolling, we may identify two ways to deal with Mary Sues and Even Canon Sues:
*The first one, and quite accessible is character development, while this implies a risk of expanding the infection it is possible to remove a Sue status with a good writer either making fanfiction or a spin-off where the Mary Sue is changed for the better.  Examples of this has been seen in long-existent characters which due good writing become more down to earth, with the added bonus of annoying fans of the Sue period of time to no end, after all, one fanfic denies another.
*The second one is retcon, being the easiest way to annihilate a Mary Sue is to achieve the general consensus that it never happened.  This is harder of course as it requires the creators recognizing they made the wrong decisions or at least conceding to the fans.  It can happen, but it can only be through official involvement, which requires a lot of fan reaction to happen.
Finally, when it comes to reality, badly written characters end falling by their own weight, this is the reason no one remembers most of the overpowered characters added in fanfiction.net while everyone remembers cool, well molded characters, after all, reality ensues.


==Gallery==
==Gallery==

Revision as of 03:10, 21 October 2016



Originally a Mary Sue is a character that is a shameless self-insert, poorly developed, without flaws and stupidly overpowered. /tg/ hates Mary Sues.

Unfortunately, after so much rage and so many troll threads, /tg/'s definition of Mary Sue has become blurred to the point that any character at all can be (and probably has been) accused of being a Mary Sue on even the flimsiest of pretenses.

Some accept nothing less than the above description, and will sooner gut you then look twice if you say it's anything else. Others prefer a more generalized definition, which refers to an overly-idealized character who exerts an unjust amount of influence upon their respective setting or story. Others still carry this meaning out to extremes, and use the term to describe anyone who isn't a homeless junkie or a brooding sociopath with an alignment of chaotic neutral.

However, there is a conundrum regarding the definition. If the character is overpowered, idealized and part of an established story (such as some portrayals of Wolverine and Batman), some say that this is not a Mary Sue, as they are a canon character in an original story. For them, the term "Canon Sue" is used. The only difference between a Mary Sue and a Canon Sue (I'd like to take the time to apologize to any real-life people named "Sue" who are reading this) is a Canon Sue is an established character in the story/wish-fulfillment for the creator of the story (NOTE: few people will admit if the fictional character they create is for wish-fulfillment). For the sake of this page, the definition of Mary Sue will also include Canon Sues.

Another problem is when people use the term "Mary Sue" to refer to a "creator's pet"; a character that part of the fanbase dislikes but is adored by the creator of the character and gets treatment such as increasing focus, magnifying the importance of their role, and having the other characters talk about how awesome they are in painful ignorance — or sometimes in spite — of the fans' obvious hatred. This is not a Mary Sue though a character can be both; the two types share common traits and a Creator's Pet is more easily defined. For example; Marneus Calgar is a creator's pet, while some characters who are both Mary Sues and creator's pets are Thrall, Alice and Bella.

It is worth noting, however, that very rare authors have the skill to pull off the Mary Sue, creating a character of such epic awesomeness (Re. Jean Luc Picard) that no one gives a shit.

Mary Sue is something poor writters invented to differenciate poorest writers from themselves so they can feel a bit good about their lack of artistry and verbosity. You are all crap.

Gallery

External Links