Stupid Neutral: Difference between revisions
1d4chan>Dark Angel 2020 No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
"Proper" Neutral would be more reactive, basically not going out of your way to do anything evil or good and just getting on with things like a normal person, if a sweet payday comes up that requires killing a few folks, you do it since you need the money rather than any ideological reason or desire to kill, then you pay your lawful taxes because to do otherwise just invites trouble. | "Proper" Neutral would be more reactive, basically not going out of your way to do anything evil or good and just getting on with things like a normal person, if a sweet payday comes up that requires killing a few folks, you do it since you need the money rather than any ideological reason or desire to kill, then you pay your lawful taxes because to do otherwise just invites trouble. | ||
Stupid Neutrality requires either being active about it ''(ie: a conscious desire to BE neutral) ''or absolutely passive ''(ie: you don't factor | Stupid Neutrality requires either being active about it ''(ie: a conscious desire to BE neutral) ''or absolutely passive ''(ie: you don't factor important things like consequences into your decision making at all)''. | ||
Ambivalence towards alignment generally implies they are not bothered by it, so a True Neutral player who doesn't actually care about good vs evil or chaos vs law might as well just be Chaotic Neutral anyway, since they are going to make decisions based upon whatever suits them at a given moment in time and can be trusted to have the same moral capacity of a chimpanzee. These are the sorts of people who rationalise stealing your shit because they "needed" it rather than out of any particular sort of malice or avarice, but unlike an animal he actually understood the moral and legal ramifications of his actions and did it anyway. | Ambivalence towards alignment generally implies they are not bothered by it, so a True Neutral player who doesn't actually care about good vs evil or chaos vs law might as well just be Chaotic Neutral anyway, since they are going to make decisions based upon whatever suits them at a given moment in time and can be trusted to have the same moral capacity of a chimpanzee. These are the sorts of people who rationalise stealing your shit because they "needed" it rather than out of any particular sort of malice or avarice, but unlike an animal he actually understood the moral and legal ramifications of his actions and did it anyway. |
Revision as of 17:31, 12 March 2015
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbea3/fbea381886d58414f9ed986dcf88c88acb82e2ea" alt=""
Stupid Neutral is a term derived from the Dungeons & Dragons alignment system, but can easily be applied to characters in any role-playing game in fact, it can be applied to characters in any medium, or even real life for a specific way of playing a absolutely "neutral" character.
Definition
Much like Stupid Good which is Good for goodness sake, and Stupid Evil for evils sake, Chaotic Stupid for the sake of being chaotic and Lawful Stupid in following the law even when it doesn't make sense. Stupid Neutral is perhaps the most retarded and represents neutrality for neutrality's sake. Players who play a neutral character generally expect themselves to be morally ambivalent towards good/evil or law/chaos depending where on the axis they sit, but would still have at least one aspect of the alignment to guide their actions (ie: Neutral Good) so can't really be Stupid Neutral (though kudos to the Chaotic Neutral player who tries to pull off) This means that Stupid Neutral players can only generally be of one alignment: True Neutral. But the problem is that as sentient creatures, we all understand the concept of morality and law, even if we as people don't agree with them. So people who espouse "Neutrality" generally either accept it and work with it, or can't be bothered by it and it happens anyway.
"Proper" Neutral would be more reactive, basically not going out of your way to do anything evil or good and just getting on with things like a normal person, if a sweet payday comes up that requires killing a few folks, you do it since you need the money rather than any ideological reason or desire to kill, then you pay your lawful taxes because to do otherwise just invites trouble.
Stupid Neutrality requires either being active about it (ie: a conscious desire to BE neutral) or absolutely passive (ie: you don't factor important things like consequences into your decision making at all).
Ambivalence towards alignment generally implies they are not bothered by it, so a True Neutral player who doesn't actually care about good vs evil or chaos vs law might as well just be Chaotic Neutral anyway, since they are going to make decisions based upon whatever suits them at a given moment in time and can be trusted to have the same moral capacity of a chimpanzee. These are the sorts of people who rationalise stealing your shit because they "needed" it rather than out of any particular sort of malice or avarice, but unlike an animal he actually understood the moral and legal ramifications of his actions and did it anyway.
WANNABE True Neutral players are making a stance on neutrality, as if the cosmos needs to keep good and evil in a state of balance and that neither is better than the other. But if a mystic balance needs to be enforced to the point of anal retention and the player is the sort of obsessive person who will tell his compatriots that they need to stop being so good or lawful because the universe says so then he's almost become Lawful Neutral just by himself, since he's just following the Universal order.
It could be possible in gameplay to be Neutral to the point of Stupidity, but generally speaking, your GM cannot really account for your intentions, and only your actions. One can make the argument that following the law does not necessarily make you lawful, and that's true, but willful disregard for the law (even if you aren't breaking any laws at that given moment in time) is a chaotic mentality, especially if all you are doing is see-sawing back and forward on the alignment axis in an attempt to maintain some semblance of balance.
Also, if you ever start beating up Angels because "the universe needs balancing out", then that's pretty much evil in itself, especially since Angels probably weren't going to go out of their way to do you any harm unless you do something REALLY bad to piss them off. Basically what we're saying is that anyway you look at it, the only way to be Truly Neutral would to be an actual animal who has no understanding of morality or law whatsoever. Either that or someone with a retarded level of intelligence. Either that or you spend your life doing NOTHING.
Examples
- AO from the Forgotten Realms probably fits the bill, since he sits back and eats doritos all day, not bothering about anything in the multiverse, whether gods are killing each other or not. Only stepping in when the universe stops working properly and fixing it like a cosmic janitor with infinite power.
- The Lady of Pain also probably fits, but is so far beyond morality since no-one can quite understand her.
- Advanced Dungeons & Dragons actively describes True Neutral in Stupid Neutral of the "actively sabotages good, evil, law and chaos when they get too powerful" terms.
- Played for laughs in Futurama with the Neutrals: a race of aliens whose gimmick is that they act as neutral as possible. Live Free or Don't.