EA: Difference between revisions

From 2d4chan
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1d4chan>McNash
No edit summary
I am not sure if this page belongs on this wiki, but as long as its here, it should probably have the /v/ template, and should definitely have the Not Related Category.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{/vg/}}
Ah, Electronic Arts (often shortened to EA)... yeah, fuck them
Ah, Electronic Arts (often shortened to EA)... yeah, fuck them


Line 29: Line 30:
[[Category:Video Games]]
[[Category:Video Games]]
[[Category:RAGE]]
[[Category:RAGE]]
[[Category:Not Related]]

Revision as of 04:48, 21 August 2013

This is a /v/ related article, which we tolerate because it's relevant and/or popular on /tg/... or we just can't be bothered to delete it.

Ah, Electronic Arts (often shortened to EA)... yeah, fuck them

Basically, here is a quick history to the monstrous conglomerate we know as EA.


Long, Long ago... in a time now forgotten... EA gave a shit what their customers wanted, in fact they were hailed as one of the greatest groups in the gaming industry, seeing an EA logo meant you would be in for an enjoyable time. Not any more

No one really knows why EA became shit but it is suspected that (like all large companies) they forgot what it was that made them great (I.E. CARING ABOUT THE CUSTOMER). When a company once run by men and women who loved making games and knew how to make them great were bought out by corporate suits who knew how to make pastries and toasters rather than art.

Either way that is the past... what? you wanted more? Too bad, I'm here to rant, not give you a history lesson.

Anyway, EA decided at one point "hey, why should we work hard when we could buy out other successful game producers and slowly drive them into the ground?" and so they did they have, in fact, been doing this for years, as such fans of games that now bear the EA logo have begun to think of it as a slow acting Rock of Doom. The Ultima series, a major pioneer in the RPG genre, is a pretty infamous example where they bought out the developers and killed the series after rushing two games into production.

This has become even more apparent after their acquisition of Bioware, where they have completely fucked it over.

Oh, and no exaggeration, EA has been voted the worst company in America, even beating the previous "winner" of that position, Bank of America, showing that even non-gamers hate them. Seriously, google it. Now they are the worst company twice in a row. They make everything a yearly franchise.

In sum, EA is the GW of /v/ while Command and Conquer is basically 40k of /v/.

The main debate these days is whether EA or Activision is worse; while EA atleast TRIES to diversify itself and can still make relatively good games, just cutting them to pieces and charging you extra for it in the manner of DLC (I.E: You paid for a $50 game? Expect to pay about $50 more to get the full experience), Activision has done nothing but recycle their Call of Duty franchise so repetitively that their Modern Warfare 3 game, for example, was nothing but a complete re-skin of it's prequel; Modern Warfare 2, with very little in the way of new features.

TL;DR EA is like The Imperium of Man, they have an horrible customer and employee management, commit awful acts which result in a lot of people fired or screwed, yet, they survive through sheer size and cash (up to the point they spend studios like the Imperial Guard spends regiments) and by having some state-of-the-art stuff which allow them to go toe-to-toe with other companies, some of their games are awesome or at least passable.