|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| '''Psion''' is the D&D way of saying "[[Psyker|psychic]]". It is a common opinion that psions in D&D are overpowered. This stems from time and time again of game designers trying to make psychic powers something different than spellcasting, and fucking up the game design doing it.
| | a wizard that isnt a wizard |
| | |
| It is believed that Dungeons & Dragons' psionics is cursed. That these books are not RPG supplements, but grimoires of a sadistic cult, playing with your emotions. To have any D&D psionics book present in the room will ensure you always roll poorly.
| |
| | |
| [[File:Southpark_S08E13.jpg|left|thumb|Pretend this psionic fight is an animated *.gif; it would look just the same]]
| |
| ==[[AD&D]]==
| |
| In 1st edition, psions were normal characters that rolled 99-100 on d100 during chargen, and gained extra spellcasting that didn't require spellbooks nor devotion to a faith. They had their own psionic-only battles that were invisible to non-psionics, and required their own combat matrix on the DM's screen so you could play rock-paper-scissors-lizard-spock with the five attacks and five defenses. Only one attack could actually affect non-psionics, and it was less effective than casing ''Feeblemind'' or just punching someone in the jaw. Everyone else would just stand around and watch an invisible, silent fight between people standing perfectly still. Whoop-de-doo.
| |
| | |
| [[File:Mvc2_Psylocke.jpg|right|thumb|Yeah we know why you ''really'' want to play a Soulknife]]
| |
| ==[[Dungeons & Dragons 3rd Edition|Third edition]]==
| |
| D&D 3.0 had horrific mechanics: the ultimate [[Multiple_Ability_Dependency|M.A.D.]], where you needed a high stat for every subcategory of psionics to have a decent power. There were no supplements for 3.0 psionics, amd we're okay with this.
| |
| | |
| In [[3.5e]], psionics were simpler: Psions were accountant spellcasters who kept track of a mana pool. Psionic powers didn't level up (well, most of them), instead the psion would spend mana ("power points") to increase a power's effect. Other players raged about this being h4x because a psion could turn themselves into glass cannons and screw a BBEG if they really wanted to. Most of the complaints about psionics came from pro spellcasters, who want to be the only ones with an "I win" button.
| |
| | |
| 3.5e psionics only had one good class: the Psion, or psychic sorcerer. [[Psychic Warrior]] was just a better fighter (which isn't saying much). The [[wilder]] was a psionic [[warlock]], the [[Soulknife]] was a shitty knock-off of [[monk]] WITH LIGHTSABERS11!!ELEVEN11!!! just like that hot Asian chick in X-men comics. The other classes described in the Complete Psionic book aren't worth mentioning.
| |
| {{D&D3-Classes}}
| |
| | |
| ==[[Dungeons & Dragons 4th Edition|Fourth Edition]]==
| |
| In 4e, psionics had their simplest rules ever; though they were still fairly unique, they didn't diverge too greatly from the template of at-will, encounter and daily powers that all other classes shared. Psionic classes were unique in that they had no encounter class powers, instead gaining new at-wills when they would gain encounter powers; however, they had a pseudo-mana system of "psionic augmentation points" (or "power points, again) that could be spent to bump up the effects of at-wills, depending on how much was spent; these spent points recovered after short rests, furthering the encounter-power similarity. There were four psionic classes in the tank/heals/dps routine: '''[[Ardent]]s''' were your empaths and psychic healer leaders, '''[[Battlemind]]s''' were your front-line Defenders with iron-hard skin and superspeed, '''[[Monk]]s''' would wire-fu around the battlefield to be high damage Strikers, and '''Psions''' proper would be Controllers using Force-push, mass telepathy and conjuring.
| |
| | |
| {{D&D4-Classes}}
| |
| | |
| ==Fifth Edition==
| |
| Though psionics have been given a test-release as Unearthed Arcana, it seems the psion of editions past will be replaced by a new class called the mystic.
| |
a wizard that isnt a wizard