Shota: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''Shota''' is esssentially [[loli]], except with little boys rather than little girls; also like loli it is pedophilic in nature. | '''Shota''' is esssentially [[loli]], except with little boys rather than little girls; also like loli it is pedophilic in nature. | ||
Presumably, it exists because of [[Slaanesh]]i influence, specific examples of this [[heresy]] are depicted below, in the form of mature and domineering characters from fictional settings predating on boys. | Presumably, it exists because of [[Slaanesh]]i influence, specific examples of this [[heresy]] are depicted below, in the form of mature and domineering characters from fictional settings predating on boys. | ||
Sidenote: If you feel that this is fine then please see the local commissar for a long overdue blamming. | |||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
Revision as of 18:06, 7 February 2023
 This article is a stub. You can help 1d4chan by expanding it |
Shota is esssentially loli, except with little boys rather than little girls; also like loli it is pedophilic in nature.
Presumably, it exists because of Slaaneshi influence, specific examples of this heresy are depicted below, in the form of mature and domineering characters from fictional settings predating on boys.
Sidenote: If you feel that this is fine then please see the local commissar for a long overdue blamming.
-
Here we see a Slaaneshi cultist running a Sisters of Battle false flag operation. -
Here we see two Eldar displaying newly-learned compassion for those not like them by comfoting a human child who just lost family in a battle in a situation that is only sexual if your heretical mind reads such connotations into it. (that lucky bastard...) -
This on the other hand? No excuses.
