TVTropes: Difference between revisions

From 2d4chan
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1d4chan>Newerfag
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
In essence, it exists to catalog the various recurring patterns in stories, characters, and general entertainment production and consumption. As such, it can be quite an addictive read (insert "TVTropes ruined my life" joke here).
In essence, it exists to catalog the various recurring patterns in stories, characters, and general entertainment production and consumption. As such, it can be quite an addictive read (insert "TVTropes ruined my life" joke here).


It attracts a great quantity of weeaboos, neckbeards, fanboys, fangirls, fanhermaphrodites, other weirdos, and just plain losers as editors, and it shows frequently in the general writing style and the types of pages included. It's a great place, in theory, to go to find ideas for your next campaign - but don't overdo it, since that's ''only'' '''in theory'''. Unfortunately, TVTropes is the kind of site that lends itself to categorization for categorization's sake like a lot of other wikis but amplified so far that its users can no longer see any kind of media as anything other than a collection of archetypes and cliches. Poorly written examples and argumentative sperging over the smallest and most seemingly insignificant of minutiae, and that's not even getting into the times where they try to force tropes into applying to the real world with predictably disastrous results.
It attracts a great quantity of weeaboos, neckbeards, fanboys, fangirls, fanhermaphrodites, other weirdos, and just plain losers as editors, and it shows frequently in the general writing style and the types of pages included. It's a great place, in theory, to go to find ideas for your next campaign - but don't overdo it, since that's ''only'' '''in theory'''. Unfortunately, TVTropes is the kind of site that lends itself to categorization for categorization's sake like a lot of other wikis, but amplified so far that its users can no longer see any kind of media as anything other than a collection of archetypes and cliches. Poorly written examples and argumentative sperging over the smallest and most seemingly insignificant of minutiae abound, and that's not even getting into the times where they try to force tropes into applying to the real world with predictably disastrous results.


Beyond that, it's worth mentioning here only because it has had a definite influence on fandom and internet culture in general, being a product of such. It's also prone to in-jokes that occasionally leak out onto the wider Internet (sometimes known as a ''TVTropism''). AS such, it'll probably show up at your table, either directly mentioned by [[That Guy|someone trying to seem like a better writer than they really are]], or by other players using certain terms from it.  
Beyond that, it's worth mentioning here only because it has had a definite influence on fandom and internet culture in general, being a product of such. It's also prone to in-jokes that occasionally leak out onto the wider Internet (sometimes known as a ''TVTropism''). AS such, it'll probably show up at your table, either directly mentioned by [[That Guy|someone trying to seem like a better writer than they really are]], or by other players using certain terms from it.  

Revision as of 19:22, 16 March 2018

This article is a stub. You can help 1d4chan by expanding it

TVTropes.

It's one of the Internet's leading sources of Skub, so we'll try to confine ourselves to a few simple facts.

In essence, it exists to catalog the various recurring patterns in stories, characters, and general entertainment production and consumption. As such, it can be quite an addictive read (insert "TVTropes ruined my life" joke here).

It attracts a great quantity of weeaboos, neckbeards, fanboys, fangirls, fanhermaphrodites, other weirdos, and just plain losers as editors, and it shows frequently in the general writing style and the types of pages included. It's a great place, in theory, to go to find ideas for your next campaign - but don't overdo it, since that's only in theory. Unfortunately, TVTropes is the kind of site that lends itself to categorization for categorization's sake like a lot of other wikis, but amplified so far that its users can no longer see any kind of media as anything other than a collection of archetypes and cliches. Poorly written examples and argumentative sperging over the smallest and most seemingly insignificant of minutiae abound, and that's not even getting into the times where they try to force tropes into applying to the real world with predictably disastrous results.

Beyond that, it's worth mentioning here only because it has had a definite influence on fandom and internet culture in general, being a product of such. It's also prone to in-jokes that occasionally leak out onto the wider Internet (sometimes known as a TVTropism). AS such, it'll probably show up at your table, either directly mentioned by someone trying to seem like a better writer than they really are, or by other players using certain terms from it.

To speak of it any further is to invite madness.

WARNING