Warhammer/Tactics/8th Edition/Skaven: Difference between revisions
1d4chan>Jemas42 |
1d4chan>Jemas42 |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* '''Lord Skrolk:''' The reason you like Lord Skrolk is because he makes Plague Monks troops. Seriously, that's the ONLY thing that justifies his inhumanly high entry cost (230 points more than a Vanilla Grey Seer, or 30 more than a Grey Seer on Screaming Bell). He comes with some fun abilities and magic items, but even they can probably be outdone for less cost (Liber Bubonicus would be more fun if it weren't for the current rules on Bound Spells and it's 1 in 6 chance of going dud when cast). Ultimately he's too pricey. If you're planning on taking a lot of Plague Monks, he can justify his points, but otherwise? Skip him. | * '''Lord Skrolk:''' The reason you like Lord Skrolk is because he makes Plague Monks troops. Seriously, that's the ONLY thing that justifies his inhumanly high entry cost (230 points more than a Vanilla Grey Seer, or 30 more than a Grey Seer on Screaming Bell). He comes with some fun abilities and magic items, but even they can probably be outdone for less cost (Liber Bubonicus would be more fun if it weren't for the current rules on Bound Spells and it's 1 in 6 chance of going dud when cast). Ultimately he's too pricey. If you're planning on taking a lot of Plague Monks, he can justify his points, but otherwise? Skip him. | ||
* '''Thanquol and Boneripper:''' Do you want your army led by a drugged up failure with his mechanical bodyguard? Okay, so that's kinda mean, but he's not bad. He comes with some amusing special rules (his Ward Save deflecting onto a nearby model is funny) and Boneripper can be nasty. He's squarely non-competitive but if you wanna use him in a casual game, he can be funny. | * '''Thanquol and Boneripper:''' Do you want your army led by a drugged up failure with his mechanical bodyguard? Okay, so that's kinda mean, but he's not bad. He comes with some amusing special rules (his Ward Save deflecting onto a nearby model is funny) and Boneripper can be nasty. He's squarely non-competitive but if you wanna use him in a casual game, he can be funny. Leave him out of tournament lists. | ||
====Generic Characters==== | ====Generic Characters==== | ||
Revision as of 00:36, 31 March 2012
 This article is a stub. You can help 1d4chan by expanding it |
Why Play Skaven
The Skaven offer the ability throw the largest infantry blocks in the game, and have very deadly selection of war machines, so anybody that's fond of either is likely to love them. Due note possible Rage over the fact that they are often considered overpowered in the current rules the put an emphasis on mass infantry blocks since they can field extremely large blocks for a very low cost (200 points for 100 slaves for example).
Also DOOMWHEELS
Unit Analysis
Lords & Heroes
Named Characters
Note: Under the current edition, named characters tend to be overpriced; you can pretty easily emulate most named characters from scratch and save yourself some points. That said, a few named characters do have abilities and wargear or wargear combos unique to them, so if you absolutely need to have them, go ahead. Just make sure you're really getting your points worth.
- Lord Skrolk: The reason you like Lord Skrolk is because he makes Plague Monks troops. Seriously, that's the ONLY thing that justifies his inhumanly high entry cost (230 points more than a Vanilla Grey Seer, or 30 more than a Grey Seer on Screaming Bell). He comes with some fun abilities and magic items, but even they can probably be outdone for less cost (Liber Bubonicus would be more fun if it weren't for the current rules on Bound Spells and it's 1 in 6 chance of going dud when cast). Ultimately he's too pricey. If you're planning on taking a lot of Plague Monks, he can justify his points, but otherwise? Skip him.
- Thanquol and Boneripper: Do you want your army led by a drugged up failure with his mechanical bodyguard? Okay, so that's kinda mean, but he's not bad. He comes with some amusing special rules (his Ward Save deflecting onto a nearby model is funny) and Boneripper can be nasty. He's squarely non-competitive but if you wanna use him in a casual game, he can be funny. Leave him out of tournament lists.
Generic Characters
Note: While named characters are judged against their generic counterparts, generic characters are examined based on their role in your army.