|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[File:Riptides_arent_op_in_7th.jpg|1200px|thumb|left|The catalyst.]]
| |
|
| |
|
| {{clear|left}}
| |
|
| |
| == Original Post ==
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single Riptide is "OP". It's not. They're the Tau's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some Termies or a Land Raider. If they bring multiple and in the Wing, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also Kroot are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If Tau auxiliaries had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat units into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single unit. A good Tau player would know that some well supported fire warrior unit is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other units.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non Tau players complain about "muh Battlesuits or muh Riptides" They're there in the codex, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the battle suits. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other Tau players have to stop using a particular unit. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| == Dreadnoughts aren't OP in 7th ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single Dreadnought is "OP". It's not. They're the Space Marines's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some battlesuits or a riptide. If they bring multiple and in the Wing, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also Scouts are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If 10th company had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat units into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single unit. A good Space Marine player would know that some well supported tactical marine unit is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other units.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non Space Marine players complain about "muh Dreadnoughts or muh Terminators" They're there in the codex, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the contemptors. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other Space Marine players have to stop using a particular unit. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| == Deff Dredds aren't OP in 7th ==
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single DeffDredd is "OP". It's not. They're the Ork's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some Termies or a Land Raider. If they bring multiple and in the Wing, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also Grots are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If the small greenskins had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat units into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single unit. A good Ork player would know that some well supported Nob unit is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other units.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non Ork players complain about "muh Deff Dredds or muh Trukks" They're there in the codex, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the Gargants. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other Ork players have to stop using a particular unit. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| == Wraithknights aren't OP in 7th ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single Wraithknight is "OP". It's not. They're the Eldar's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some Termies or a Land Raider. If they bring multiple and in the Dreamwalker Squad, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also Rangers are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If Alaitoc Pathfinders had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat units into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single unit. A good Eldar player would know that some well supported guardian unit is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other units.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non Eldar players complain about "muh Wraithlords or muh Wraithknights" They're there in the codex, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the Wraith Titans. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other Eldar players have to stop using a particular unit. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| == Carnifexes aren't OP in 7th ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single Carnifex is "OP". It's not. They're the Tyranid's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some Termies or a Land Raider. If they bring multiple and in the Wing, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also Genestealers are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If Genestealers had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat units into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single unit. A good Nid player would know that some well supported Brood Lord is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other units.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non Nid players complain about "muh Carnifexes or muh pyrovores" They're there in the codex, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the bioforms. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other Tyranid players have to stop using a particular unit. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| == Helbrutes aren't OP in 7th ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single Helbrute is "OP". It's not. They're CSM's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some Riptides or a Stormsurge. If they bring multiple and in the Helfist, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also cultists are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If cultists had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat units into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single unit. A good CSM player would know that some well supported chaos marine unit is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other units.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non CSM players complain about "muh Obliterators or muh Helbrutes" They're there in the codex, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the daemon engines. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other CSM players have to stop using a particular unit. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| == Knights aren't OP in 7th ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single Imperial Knight is "OP". It's not. They're the Imperial Knights' TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some Termies or a Land Raider. If they bring multiple and in the Wing, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also Scions Aspirant are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If Imperial Knights had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat units into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single unit. A good Knight player would know that some well supported Knight Warden is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other units.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non Imperial Knight players complain about "muh Paladins or muh Crusaders" They're there in the codex, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the Cerastus. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other Imperial Knight players have to stop using a particular unit. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| == Warlord Titans aren't OP in 7th ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single Warlord Titan is "OP". It's not. They're the Adeptus Titanicus's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some Termies or a Land Raider. If they bring multiple and in the Wing, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also Reaver Titans are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If princeps had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat units into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single unit. A good Adeptus Titanicus player would know that some well supported Knight unit is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other units.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non Adeptus Titanicus players complain about "muh emperors or muh warlords" They're there in the codex, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the Titans. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other Adeptus Titanicus players have to stop using a particular unit. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| == Baneblades aren't OP in 7th ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a Baneblade is "OP". It's not. They're the IG's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some termies or a land raider. If they bring multiple and in the Wing, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also Leman Russes are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If tanks named after furries had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat units into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single unit. A good Guard player would know that some well supported Basilisk unit is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other units.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non Guard players complain about "muh Baneblades or muh titan allies" They're there in the codex, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the Baneblades. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other Guard players have to stop using a particular unit. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| == Primarchs aren't OP in 7th ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single Primarch is "OP". It's not. They're the Legions's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some Termies or a Land Raider. If they bring multiple and in the Wing, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also Nightlords are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If edge lords had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat units into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single unit. A good 30k player would know that some well supported breacher unit is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other units.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non Legion players complain about "muh Primarchs or muh Contemptors" They're there in the codex, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the Primarchs. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other Legion players have to stop using a particular unit. Quit bitching
| |
|
| |
| == Leman Russes aren't OP in 7th ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single Leman Russ is "OP". It's not. They're the Guard's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some Termies or a Land Raider. If they bring multiple and in the company, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also Scions are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If Militarum Tempestus had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat units into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single unit. A good Guard player would know that some well supported 20 man platoon unit is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other units.
| |
|
| |
| == Dreadknights aren't OP in 7th ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a Dreadknight is "OP". It's not. They're the Grey Knights's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some termies or a land raider. If they bring multiple and in the Wing, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also Paladins are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If Europa Marines had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat units into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single unit. A good Grey Knights player would know that some well supported Lord Kaldor Draigo unit is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other units.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non Guard players complain about "muh Dreadknights or muh psychic pilots" They're there in the codex, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the Dreadknights. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other Grey Knights players have to stop using a particular unit. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| == Monstrous Creatures aren't OP in 7th ==
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non Guard players complain about "muh Pask or muh Wyvern" They're there in the codex, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the baneblade equivalent. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other Guard players have to stop using a particular unit. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single Monstrous Creature is "OP". It's not. They're the game's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some Termies or a Land Raider. If they bring multiple and in the Wing, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also Flying Monstrous Creatures are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If the basic rules had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat units into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single unit. A good 40k player would know that some well supported MEQ is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other units.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non 40k players complain about "muh monstrous creatures or muh board space" They're there in the basic rules, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the $90 books. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other 40k players players have to stop using a particular unit. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| == Shitposters aren't OP on 4chan ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single shitposter is "OP". It's not. They're 4chan's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some Tripfags or a Chickenposter. If they bring multiple and in the /b/, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also Anonymous posters are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If /tg/ had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat units into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single unit. A good shitposter would know that some well supported copypasta is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti argument fire power than the other pastas.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non shitposters complain about "muh Reddit or muh Tumblr" They're there on the internet, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the janitors. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other shitposters have to stop using a particular pasta. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| == Land Trains aren't OP in 7th ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single Land Train is "OP". It's not. They're the Squat's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some Termies or a Land Raider. If they bring multiple and in the Wing, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also Engineers are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If non-existent codexes had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat units into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single unit. A good Squat player would know that some well supported Cyclops unit is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other units.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non Squat players complain about "muh Landtrains or muh Goliath Mega Cannon" They're not there in the codex, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the expunged records. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other Squat players have to stop using a particular unit. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| == Katanas aren't OP in 3.5 ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single katana is "OP". It's not. They're the ninja's Great axe equivalent. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some Spells or a Platemail suit of armor. If they bring multiple and in the Wing, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also Throwing stars are shit. They're just expendable ammunition. Having a whole inventory oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If Eastern weapons had the same love that longswords then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" character to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat abilites into the battle in a character sheet. Not just spamming any one single weapon. A good Ninja player would know that some well supported Sneak attack is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other powers.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non Ninja players complain about "muh chaotic randumb or muh anime" They're there in the Player's Handbook, they have a purpose, just like the Monte Cookes.source then any of the Player classes. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other Ninja players have to stop using a particular weapon. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| == Wizards aren't OP in Pathfinder ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single Wizard is "OP". It's not. They're the Cleric's arcane equivalent. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some Fighters or a Barbarian. If they bring multiple and in the Wing, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also summoned minions are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole spellbook oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If casters had the same love that Tome of Battle then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" character to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat abilites into the battle in a character sheet. Not just spamming any one single spell. A good Wizard player would know that some well supported Fireball is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other spells.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non Wizard players complain about "muh 15m gold a day or muh toolbox" They're there in the Player's Handbook, they have a purpose, just like the Paizo's.source then any of the PrCs. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other Wizard players have to stop using a particular build. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| == Words aren't OP in English ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single word is "OP". It's not. They're the dictionary's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some Termies or a Land Raider. If they bring multiple and in the Paragraph, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also letters are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If letter auxiliaries had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" essay to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat rhetoric into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single word. A good writer would know that some well supported letter is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti meme fire power than the other words.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non Writer players complain about "muh words or muh grammar" They're there in the dictionary, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the words. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other word players have to stop using a particular sentence. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| == OP units aren't OP in 7th ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a single OP unit is "OP". It's not. They're the ITC platform's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some Termies or a Land Raider. If they bring multiple and in a decurion, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also fluffy lists are shit. They're just expensive time wasters. Having a whole army oriented around that idea would be incredibly boring. If balance had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the OP units into the battle in a broken fashion. Just spamming a single unit. A good player would know that some unbalanced unit is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other units.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non-WAAC players complain about "muh balance or muh optimisation" They're there in the game, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the rules. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other WAAC players have to stop using a particular unit. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| == Hurt Butts aren't OP in 7th ==
| |
|
| |
| I kinda want to get this mentality out that having a hurt butt is "OP". It's not. They're the lolcow's TEQ. It's fair if they can have one if you bring some termies or a land raider. If they bring multiple and in the Wing, then yes that is pretty cheesy.
| |
|
| |
| Also hurt fee fees are shit. They're just expendable meatshields. Having a whole army oriented around them would be incredibly boring. If your home life had the same love that Genestealers then that would be fine.
| |
|
| |
| A "fun" army to play against is something that tries to bring all the neat units into the battle in a combined arms fashion. Not just spamming any one single unit. A good /r9k/ poster would know that some well supported no gf thread is a cheaper and arguably better source of anti infantry fire power than the other units.
| |
|
| |
| I'm so tired of hearing non butthurt posters complain about "muh feel threads or muh ai girlfriends" They're there in the codex, they have a purpose, just like the FWs.source then any of the butthurt. Just because you get butthurt at the cheesemongers doesn't mean that the other butthurt posters have to stop using a particular unit. Quit bitching.
| |
|
| |
| [[Category:Copypasta]]
| |
| [[Category:Meme]]
| |
| [[Category:Weeaboo]]
| |
| [[Category:/tg/_40,000]]
| |