Talk:Main Page

From 2d4chan
Latest comment: 04:05 by 185.156.46.165 in topic 1d6chan on suicide watch
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Anti-spam measures?[edit source]

Will any be added? Nanashi (talk) 14:35, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nigga please, 2d4 is deader than /tg/ 91.150.192.23 11:18, 10 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'd rather some means of staying online would work - tried to create an account and restore my userpage... Creating the account works, creating the page, not so much, since the session is constantly killed. 98.128.173.20 11:41, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

1d6chan on suicide watch[edit source]

https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Wiki_reports#c-SooSoo-20260831212100-Content_Policy_violations:


They're either going to get shut down or delete most of their copy of the wiki. This sure would be a great time for 2d4fag to show his face instead of pretending to be dead. 23.234.100.47 13:32, 2 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

>2d4fag to show his face instead of pretending to be dead.
Yeah well, that's true, but the same could have been said for the past year. So my bet is he'll keep making an embarrassment out of himself. Someone besides him should host a copy of this wiki with the spam removed and/or 1d6chan. To be quite honest with you, I've admin'd Wikis myself before but I don't think I could be bothered with the hosting. Someone else might care enough to do it.
RE: Content Policy violations (complaint to Miraheze):
>From what I know, the exact wording, layout, flavor text, and explanations printed in D&D's Player's Handbook cannot be copied. This wiki has a lot of text which is just copypasted text straight from D&D splatbooks, which I believe is a copyright violation.
Karen doesn't know or care about the fact "copyright" doesn't apply to content used for educational purposes, which is allowed under US Fair Use doctrine.
>The character pictured here is obviously underage, and even then, their dialog is obviously meant to evoke that of a child, making the content worrying and a violation of the content policy
Lol
>Furthermore, looking at the wiki, it contains 4 results for the n-slur, a staggering +50 results for the f-slur, and missed searches on the previous because the f-slur is used as a suffix there.
Oh no, Reddit forbid, that degenerates whom are condemned in the Bible itself and also the human subspecies of dubious IQ ever have a negative label applied to them.
>I must also ask if this doesn't fall within the scope of being a Reception wiki, given so much of its text are recordings of the fan's critiques and receptions
Who cares, faggot? 109.70.100.6 03:58, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I mean, we're dealing with a place that bans loli content, the bar is somewhere in the sixth circle of Hell.
>To be quite honest with you, I've admin'd Wikis myself before but I don't think I could be bothered with the hosting. Someone else might care enough to do it.
Same here, I'd be happy to help set up but I'm hesitant to commit to hosting. Maybe if the 1d6chan fags actually fuck off forever so I wouldn't have to worry about getting lolcow'd. 185.156.46.165 04:05, 3 September 2026 (UTC)Reply