M3 Lee: Difference between revisions
1d4chan>Cavgunner No edit summary |
1d4chan>Cavgunner |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[File:AlfredPalmerM3tank1942b crop2 (1).jpg|thumb|"I got two guns, that should be enough for all you jerries!"]] | [[File:AlfredPalmerM3tank1942b crop2 (1).jpg|thumb|"I got two guns, that should be enough for all you jerries!"]] | ||
Outdated the day it hit the battlefield, the M3 was a crash project to field an American tank with a 75mm gun in large numbers ''immediately,'' due to the fact that the M4 Sherman was still a year or two away from entering production. Though it had serious shortcomings as a fighting vehicle, the basic M3 chassis and mechanical design were versatile and reliable. These elements would be retained in the M4 Sherman family of vehicles and related derivatives, such as the M7 Priest. | Outdated the day it hit the battlefield, the M3 was a crash project to field an American tank with a 75mm gun in large numbers ''immediately,'' due to the fact that the M4 Sherman was still a year or two away from entering production. Though it had serious shortcomings as a fighting vehicle, the basic M3 chassis and mechanical design were versatile and reliable. These elements would be retained in the M4 Sherman family of vehicles and related derivatives, such as the [[M7 Priest]]. | ||
The Lee saw its best days in the Africa campaign, where its armor and weaponry were effective against the Panzer III and IV. Encounters with repurposed 88mm AA guns ended badly, and the riveted hull was known to have spalling issues, but the design was highly regarded for its reliability and low maintenance even in desert conditions. The Lee's firepower was very welcome after the awkward early war wimpy guns, and it was great against Japanese forces who had no practical tank that matched it. | The Lee saw its best days in the Africa campaign, where its armor and weaponry were effective against the Panzer III and IV. Encounters with repurposed 88mm AA guns ended badly, and the riveted hull was known to have spalling issues, but the design was highly regarded for its reliability and low maintenance even in desert conditions. The Lee's firepower was very welcome after the awkward early war wimpy guns, and it was great against Japanese forces who had no practical tank that matched it. |
Revision as of 17:03, 15 August 2022
"The '75(mm) is firing, the '37(mm) is firing but it's traversed round the wrong way. The Browning is jammed. I am saying "Driver advance" on the A set, and the driver who can't hear me is reversing. And as I look over the top of the turret and see twelve enemy tanks fifty yards away, someone hands me a cheese sandwich."
- – Lt. Ken Giles on commanding the 'Grant' variant of the M3.
"It is easier to make our wishes conform to our means than to make our means conform to our wishes."
- – Robert E. Lee.
The M3 Lee was the principal fighting vehicle of American and some British forces during the first quarter of World War 2. Although it served admirably, possessing high firepower and decent armor, it was obsolete upon introduction. The sponson-mounted gun arrangement was archaic and its high profile made it a large target. It was swiftly replaced by its more capable (and much more handsome) brother, the M4 Sherman.
Early War
With two pretty damned good Anti-tank guns and a lot of MGs the Lee proves to be a pretty good frontline fighter, capable of penetrating the front armor of Pz.IV's and Pz.III's reliably. Just don't expect the 37mm to be good for much else than anti-infantry and the odd flank shot. Do your best to get into situations that allow all your guns to focus on a target because even with the Secondary Weapons ruling, a ROF of 1 is still a shot in the total of 3 you'll be unleashing with MGs, 75mm and 37mm. To improve your chances though, take the long-barreled 75mm, literally no downsides.
Real Life
Outdated the day it hit the battlefield, the M3 was a crash project to field an American tank with a 75mm gun in large numbers immediately, due to the fact that the M4 Sherman was still a year or two away from entering production. Though it had serious shortcomings as a fighting vehicle, the basic M3 chassis and mechanical design were versatile and reliable. These elements would be retained in the M4 Sherman family of vehicles and related derivatives, such as the M7 Priest.
The Lee saw its best days in the Africa campaign, where its armor and weaponry were effective against the Panzer III and IV. Encounters with repurposed 88mm AA guns ended badly, and the riveted hull was known to have spalling issues, but the design was highly regarded for its reliability and low maintenance even in desert conditions. The Lee's firepower was very welcome after the awkward early war wimpy guns, and it was great against Japanese forces who had no practical tank that matched it.
US Forces in Flames of War | |
---|---|
Tanks: | M4 Sherman - M3 Lee - M5/M3 Stuart - M24 Chaffee - M26 Pershing - M27 Tank - M6 Heavy Tank - T14 Heavy Tank |
Transports: | M3 Halftrack - Jeep - DUKW |
Infantry: | US Armored Rifle Platoon - Parachute Rifle Platoon - Rifle Platoon - American Rifle Company - Glider Platoon - Machine Gun Platoon |
Artillery: | US 155mm - US 105mm Artillery - US 75mm Artillery - US 81mm Mortars - T27 Xylophone - 57mm Anti Tank Platoon - M12 155mm Artillery Battery - M7 Priest - M8 Scott |
Tank Destroyer: | M10 - M18 Hellcat - T55 Gun Motor Carriage - M36 Slugger |
Recon: | M3 Scout Car - M20 Security Section - M8 Greyhound Cavalry Recon Patrol |
Aircraft: | P40 Warhawk - P47 Thunderbolt - P38 Lightning - F4U Corsair |
Anti-Aircraft: | M15 & M16 AAA Platoon |